Single-wall carbon nanotube compositions

ABSTRACT

The invention relates to a process for sorting and separating a mixture of (n, m) type single-wall carbon nanotubes according to (n, m) type. A mixture of (n, m) type single-wall carbon nanotubes is suspended such that the single-wall carbon nanotubes are individually dispersed. The nanotube suspension can be done in a surfactant-water solution and the surfactant surrounding the nanotubes keeps the nanotube isolated and from aggregating with other nanotubes. The nanotube suspension is acidified to protonate a fraction of the nanotubes. An electric field is applied and the protonated nanotubes migrate in the electric fields at different rates dependent on their (n, m) type. Fractions of nanotubes are collected at different fractionation times. The process of protonation, applying an electric field, and fractionation is repeated at increasingly higher pH to separated the (n, m) nanotube mixture into individual (n, m) nanotube fractions. The separation enables new electronic devices requiring selected (n, m) nanotube types.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims priority from U.S. provisional application Ser.Nos. 60/361,593 filed Mar. 4, 2002, 60/361,594 filed Mar. 4, 2002 and60/390,887, filed Jun. 24, 2002, which applications are incorporatedherein by reference.

This invention was made with United States Government support underGrant Nos. NSF DMR-0073046, NSF EEC-0118007 and NSF CHE-9900417 awardedby the National Science Foundation, Grant No. NASA-JSC NCC 9-77 awardedby the National Aeronautic and Space Administration and Grant No.N00014-01-1-0789 awarded by the Office of Naval Research. Funding wasalso provided by the Texas Advanced Technology Program Grant No. TATP99-003604-0055-1999, and the Robert A. Welch Foundation Grant Nos.C-0689 and C-0807. The Government may have certain rights in theinvention.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates generally to single-wall carbon nanotubes, andmore particularly to a method for separating single-wall carbonnanotubes by type, to new materials and devices formed from theseseparated single-wall carbon nanotubes, and to methods for using thesesingle-wall carbon nanotubes, such as for optical chemical sensors.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWNT), commonly known as “buckytubes,”have unique properties, including high strength, stiffness, thermal andelectrical conductivity. SWNT are hollow, tubular fullerene moleculesconsisting essentially of sp²-hybridized carbon atoms typically arrangedin hexagons and pentagons. Single-wall carbon nanotubes typically havediameters in the range of about 0.5 nanometers (nm) and about 3.5 nm,and lengths usually greater than about 50 nm. Background information onsingle-wall carbon nanotubes can be found in B. I. Yakobson and R. E.Smalley, American Scientist, Vol. 85, July-August, 1997, pp. 324-337 andDresselhaus, et al., Science of Fullerenes and Carbon Nanotubes, 1996,San Diego: Academic Press, Ch. 19, (“Dresselhaus”).

Several methods of synthesizing fullerenes have developed from thecondensation of vaporized carbon at high temperature. Fullerenes, suchas C₆₀ and C₇₀, may be prepared by carbon arc methods using vaporizedcarbon at high temperature. Carbon nanotubes have also been produced asone of the deposits on the cathode in carbon arc processes.

Single-wall carbon nanotubes have been made in a DC arc dischargeapparatus by simultaneously evaporating carbon and a small percentage ofGroup VIIIb transition metal from the anode of the arc dischargeapparatus. These techniques allow production of only a low yield ofcarbon nanotubes, and the population of carbon nanotubes exhibitssignificant variations in structure and size.

Another method of producing single-wall carbon nanotubes involves laservaporization of a graphite substrate doped with transition metal atoms(such as nickel, cobalt, or a mixture thereof) to produce single-wallcarbon nanotubes. The single-wall carbon nanotubes produced by thismethod tend to be formed in clusters, termed “ropes,” of about 10 toabout 1000 single-wall carbon nanotubes in parallel alignment, held byvan der Waals forces in a closely packed triangular lattice. Nanotubesproduced by this method vary in structure, although certain structuresmay predominate. Although the laser vaporization process produce canproduce improved yields of single-wall carbon nanotubes, the product isstill heterogeneous, and the nanotubes tend to be too tangled for manypotential uses of these materials. In addition, the laser vaporizationof carbon is a high energy process.

Another way to synthesize carbon nanotubes is by catalytic decompositionof a carbon-containing gas by nanometer-scale metal particles supportedon a substrate. The carbon feedstock molecules dissociate on the metalparticle surface and the resulting carbon atoms combine to formnanotubes. The method typically produces imperfect multi-walled carbonnanotubes, but under certain reaction conditions, can produce excellentsingle-wall carbon nanotubes. One example of this method involves thedisproportionation of CO to form single-wall carbon nanotubes and CO₂catalyzed by transition metal catalyst particles comprising Mo, Fe, Ni,Co, or mixtures thereof residing on a support, such as alumina. Althoughthe method can use inexpensive feedstocks and moderate temperatures, theyield of single-wall carbon nanotubes can be low, with large amounts ofother forms of carbon, such as amorphous carbon and multi-wall carbonnanotubes present in the product. The method often results in tangledcarbon nanotubes and also requires the removal of the support materialfor many applications.

All-gas phase processes can be used to form single-wall carbonnanotubes. In one example of an all gas-phase process, single-wallcarbon nanotubes are synthesized using benzene as the carbon-containingfeedstock and ferrocene as the transition metal catalyst precursor. Bycontrolling the partial pressures of benzene and ferrocene and by addingthiophene as a catalyst promoter, single-wall carbon nanotubes can beproduced. However, this method suffers from simultaneous production ofmulti-wall carbon nanotubes, amorphous carbon, and other products ofhydrocarbon pyrolysis under the high temperature conditions necessary toproduce high quality single-wall carbon nanotubes.

Another method for producing single-wall carbon nanotubes involves anall-gas phase method using high pressure CO as the carbon feedstock anda gaseous transition metal catalyst precursor. (“Gas Phase Nucleationand Growth of Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes from High Pressure CarbonMonoxide,” International Pat. Publ. WO 00/26138, published May 11, 2000,incorporated by reference herein in its entirety). This method permitscontinuous nanotube production, and it has the potential for scale-up toproduce commercial quantities of single-wall carbon nanotubes. Thismethod is also effective in making single-wall carbon nanotubes withoutsimultaneously making multi-wall nanotubes. Furthermore, the methodproduces single-wall carbon nanotubes in high purity, such that lessthan about 10 wt % of the carbon in the solid product is attributable toother carbon-containing species, which includes both graphitic andamorphous carbon.

All known processes for formation of single-wall nanotubes involve atransition-metal catalyst, residues of which are invariably present inthe as-produced material. Likewise, these processes also entailproduction of varying amounts of carbon material that is not in the formof single-wall nanotubes. Hereinafter, this non-nanotube carbon materialis referred to as “amorphous carbon.”

All known methods of synthesizing single-carbon nanotubes also produce adistribution of reaction products, including, but not limited to,single-wall carbon nanotubes, amorphous carbon, metallic catalystresidues, and, in some cases, multi-wall carbon nanotubes. Thedistribution of reaction products will vary depending on the process andthe operating conditions used in the process. In addition to thedistribution of reaction products, the process type and operatingconditions will also produce single-wall carbon nanotubes having aparticular distribution of diameters and conformations.

The diameter and conformation of single-wall carbon nanotubes can bedescribed using the system of nomenclature described by Dresselhaus.Single-wall tubular fullerenes are distinguished from each other by adouble index (n, m), where n and m are integers that describe how to cuta single strip of hexagonal graphite such that its edges join seamlesslywhen the strip is wrapped onto the surface of a cylinder. When n=m, isthe resultant tube is said to be of the “armchair” or (n, n) type, sincewhen the tube is cut perpendicularly to the tube axis, only the sides ofthe hexagons are exposed and their pattern around the periphery of thetube edge resembles the arm and seat of an armchair repeated n times.When m=0, the resultant tube is said to be of the “zig-zag” or (n, 0)type, since when the tube is cut perpendicular to the tube axis, theedge is a zig-zag pattern. Where n # m and m # 0, the resulting tube haschirality and contains a helical twist to it, the extent of which isdependent upon the chiral angle. FIG. 1 diagrams the system ofnomenclature for (n, m) nanotubes.

The electronic properties of single-wall carbon nanotubes are dependenton the conformation. For example, armchair tubes are metallic and haveextremely high electrical conductivity. All single-wall carbon nanotubescan be categorized as metallic, semi-metals, or semiconducting dependingon their conformation. For clarity and conciseness, both metallic tubesand semi-metal tubes will be referred to collectively as metallicnanotubes. For single-wall carbon nanotubes, about one-third of thetubes are metallic and about two-thirds are semiconducting. Metallic (n,m)-type nanotubes are those that satisfy the condition: 2n+m=3q, orn−m=3q where “q” is an integer. Metallic nanotubes are conducting with azero band gap in energy states. Nanotubes not satisfying eithercondition are semiconducting and have an energy band gap. Generally,semiconducting nanotubes with smaller diameters have larger energy bandgaps. Regardless of tube type, all single-wall nanotubes have extremelyhigh thermal conductivity and tensile strength.

The particular nanotube diameter and conformation affects the physicaland electronic properties of the single-wall carbon nanotube. Forexample, the strength, stiffness, density, crystallinity, thermalconductivity, electrical conductivity, absorption, magnetic properties,response to doping, utility as semiconductors, optical properties suchas absorption and luminescence, utility as emitters and detectors,energy transfer, heat conduction, reaction to changes in pH, bufferingcapacity, sensitivity to a range of chemicals, contraction and expansionby electrical charge or chemical interaction, nanoporous filtrationmembranes and many more properties are affected by the diameter andconformation of the single-wall carbon nanotube.

The properties of a collection of a particular (n, m) selected carbonnanotube will differ from those of a mixture of single-wall carbonnanotubes that are made by the different production processes. Theproperties of mixtures of nanotube types represent a composite valueover a distribution of property values. This composite value isgenerally not “average” behavior. In fact, the properties of compositescan not only be inferior to, but also lacking altogether in a mixture ofsingle-wall carbon nanotubes compared to those of a particular selected(n, m) type nanotube. Additionally, in the diameter range of single-wallcarbon nanotubes, generally about 0.5 nm to about 3.5 nm, the alignmentof the nanotubes to each other in closely-packed arrays, such as thewell-known single-wall carbon nanotube “ropes”, can be optimized whenall the nanotubes are of the same diameter, minimizing misfits betweentubes of different diameter.

While a method for separating and sorting single-wall carbon nanotubesof a specific type is desired in order to capture the desired propertiesof the selected nanotube type or types, such a method is complicated bytwo major factors. First is the nanotubes' extreme lack of solubility inwater and most common solvents. Second is the strong propensity ofsingle-wall carbon nanotubes to “rope” together in bundles that arestrongly held together by van der Waals forces. The roping phenomenonaggregates different types of single-wall carbon nanotubes together inaligned bundles or “ropes” and holds them together with a sizabletube-to-tube binding energy of up to about 500 eV/micron. Theseaggregates generally contain random mixtures of metallic andsemiconducting types of nanotubes with assorted diameters. Whenelectrically contacted while in bundled aggregates, the carbon nanotubesexperience sizable perturbations from their otherwise pristineelectronic structure that complicates the differentiation betweendifferent types of nanotubes. Also, attempts to exploit the chemicaldiversity within mixtures of nanotubes, either through sidewallfunctionalization or end-group derivatization have not been successfulin separating nanotubes of specific conformations, but have producedlargely bundles of nanotubes or nanotubes with significantly alteredelectronic properties.

No effective process for making single-wall carbon nanotubes is knownwhereby significant quantities of carbon nanotubes made are of a single(n, m) type. Furthermore, to date, no methods for separating quantitiesof single-wall carbon nanotubes by (n, m) type are known, and nomacroscopic quantity of such single (n, m) type single-wall carbonnanotube material has been produced. Macroscopic amounts of type-sortedsingle-wall carbon nanotubes that would provide the broadest range ofpossible nanotube properties and applications are heretofore unknown.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to a method for sorting and separating carbonnanotubes, and in particular single-wall carbon nanotubes, by diameterand conformation, based upon the electronic and optical properties ofthe nanotubes. The invention also relates to compositions of selectednanotube types and sensing devices comprising them.

In one embodiment of the invention, single-wall carbon nanotubes aredispersed in a fluid, such that a certain fraction of the nanotubes havea net charge, and subjected to separation in an electric field. Thesingle-wall carbon nanotubes migrate through the media under theinfluence of the electric field at a rate dependent on net charge,structure and chirality of the single-wall carbon nanotube. Thenanotubes of different structure and chirality move at different rates,elute at different times, and are collected.

In another embodiment of the invention, single-wall carbon nanotubes aredispersed in a fluid, wherein the pH of the fluid is adjusted so as tocause a certain fraction of single-wall carbon nanotubes carry a netelectric charge. The charge carried by each nanotube depends on itsindividual structure and chirality. The nanotube dispersion is thensubjected to chromatographic separation in an electric field wherein thesingle-wall carbon nanotubes migrate through the fluid under theinfluence of the electric field at a rate dependent on their structureand chirality. The nanotubes of different structure and chirality eluteat different times and are collected.

In yet another embodiment of the invention, single-wall carbon nanotubesare dispersed in an aqueous system wherein the nanotubes are surroundedby a generally non-perturbing coating, such as a micellular arrangementof surfactant molecules. A mixture comprising the nanotubes and thecoating precursor, such as the surfactant, is vigorously agitated inorder to coat individual nanotubes, which are subsequently separatedfrom metallic catalyst residues and other carbon forms, such as nanotuberopes and amorphous carbon. The pH of the individually-dispersednanotube suspension is made basic and then acidified to approximatelyneutral pH so as to protonate a first fraction of single-wall carbonnanotubes. The nanotube dispersion is then subjected to electrophoreticseparation wherein the protonated single-wall carbon nanotubes migrateon a medium or diffuse through a fluid under the influence of anelectric field at a rate dependent on the structure and chirality of thesingle-wall carbon nanotube. The nanotubes of different structure andchirality elute at different times and are collected. The steps ofacidifying the remaining non-protonated portion of the nanotube mixtureand electrophoretically the nanotubes are repeated step-wise until theentire population of nanotubes has been protonated and separatedaccording to conformation and structure. Note the term “conformation”shall include all aspects of chirality or lack thereof. The term“structure” shall include all aspects of dimension, such as diameter andlength.

Type-sorted single-wall carbon nanotubes can be used as individual (n,m) types, or in combinations of selected types, so as to obtain amixture or composite material having the desired combination of nanotubeproperties. Type-selected nanotubes, and specific combinations thereof,provide the potential to achieve a continuous spectrum of material andelectronic properties based on those possessed by individual types ofsingle-wall carbon nanotubes. Density, strength, conductivity, opticalproperties, etc. can be adjusted incrementally by varying the amount ofeach (n, m) selected nanotube type to achieve the desired property orproperties. The expanded range of material and electronic propertiesenables a wide variety of applications that heretofore have not beenachieved with nanotube mixtures. Separated and type-selected single-wallcarbon nanotubes provide specific properties useful in sensors,detectors, microelectromechanical devices, and numerous otherapplications.

Selected single-wall carbon nanotubes have spectral properties that arehighly sensitive to their molecular environment. In particular,semiconducting nanotubes have been found to luminesce in thenear-infrared portion of the electromagnetic spectrum. Chemicaladsorbates on the nanotubes can affect, alter and modulate theirspectral properties. The nanotubes are also sensitive to generalconditions of the fluid environment, such as pH, temperature, pressureand flow. The nanotubes can sense these conditions as part ofnon-invasive optical probes, and are suitable for use in a nanoscaleenvironment, including, but not limited to, living biological systems.The dynamic sensing capabilities of selected types of SWNT provide for awide variety of sensing and monitoring applications.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 diagram of the system of nomenclature for carbon nanotubes.

FIG. 2 shows a single-wall carbon nanotube surrounded by surfactantmolecules arranged in micellular fashion around the nanotube.

FIG. 3A shows a Raman spectrum of individually-suspended single-wallcarbon nanotubes in a 1% SDS/D₂O solution adjusted to pH 10.3.

FIG. 3B shows a Raman spectrum of individually-suspended single-wallcarbon nanotubes in a 1% SDS/D₂O solution adjusted to pH 8.8.

FIG. 3C shows a Raman spectrum of individually-suspended single-wallcarbon nanotubes in a 1% SDS/D₂O solution adjusted to pH 6.63.

FIG. 3D shows a Raman spectrum of individually-suspended single-wallcarbon nanotubes in a 1% SDS/D₂O solution adjusted to pH 5.98.

FIG. 3E shows a Raman spectrum of individually-suspended single-wallcarbon nanotubes in a 1% SDS/D₂O solution adjusted to pH 4.55.

FIG. 3F shows a Raman spectrum of individually-suspended single-wallcarbon nanotubes in a 1% SDS/D₂O solution adjusted to pH 4.07.

FIG. 3G shows a Raman spectrum of individually-suspended single-wallcarbon nanotubes in a 1% SDS/D₂O solution adjusted to pH 3.8.

FIG. 3H shows a Raman spectrum of individually-suspended single-wallcarbon nanotubes in a 1% SDS/D₂O solution adjusted to pH 10.3.

FIG. 4A shows a spectrophotometric titration of individually dispersedcarbon nanotubes in SDS suspension as monitored by absorption. Theabsorption spectra are offset from pH 8 by a constant value to showchanges.

FIG. 4B shows spectrophotometric changes in absorption for twoparticular semiconducting nanotubes as a function of pH.

FIG. 5 shows Raman and near-IR peak monitoring for a sample ofprotonated single-wall carbon nanotubes at pH 3 during capillaryelectrophoresis without the application of an electric field.

FIG. 6 shows Raman and near-IR peak monitoring for a sample ofprotonated single-wall carbon nanotubes at pH 3 during capillaryelectrophoresis with the application of an electric field ramped from 0to 5 kV in 2 minutes.

FIG. 7 shows Raman and near-IR peak monitoring for a sample ofprotonated single-wall carbon nanotubes at pH 3 during capillaryelectrophoresis with the application of an electric field ramped from 0to 5 kV in 2 minutes and held at 5 kV for 1 minute.

FIG. 8 shows Raman and near-IR peak monitoring for a sample ofprotonated single-wall carbon nanotubes at pH 5 during capillaryelectrophoresis with the application of an electric field ramped from 0to 5 kV in 2 hours.

FIG. 9 shows Raman and near-IR peak monitoring for a sample ofprotonated single-wall carbon nanotubes at pH 5 during capillaryelectrophoresis with the application of an electric field ramped from 0to 5 kV in 2 hours and without the application of a pressure gradient.

FIG. 10 shows Raman and near-IR peak fluorescence monitoring for asample of protonated single-wall carbon nanotubes at pH 3 duringcapillary electrophoresis with the application of an electric fieldramped from 0 to 5 kV for over 2 hours. “A,” “B,” “C,” and “D” in thefigure represent the migration time through the capillary, and areapproximately 0.75 hours at point “A”, 1.25 hours at point “B”, 1.6hours at point “C” and 1.8 hours at point “D.”

FIG. 11A shows Raman spectra for a sample of protonated single-wallcarbon nanotubes that eluted from the capillary electrophoresis columnat about 0.75 hours.

FIG. 11B shows Raman spectra for a sample of protonated single-wallcarbon nanotubes that eluted from the capillary electrophoresis columnat about 1.25 hours.

FIG. 11C shows Raman spectra for a sample of protonated single-wallcarbon nanotubes that eluted from the capillary electrophoresis columnat about 1.6 hours.

FIG. 11D shows Raman spectra for a sample of protonated single-wallcarbon nanotubes that eluted from the capillary etectrophoresis columnat about 1.8 hours.

FIG. 12A shows Raman spectra (using a 785-nm laser wavelength) in therange of single-wall carbon nanotube radial breathing modes forindividual-dispersed SWNT material at pH 10.

FIG. 12B shows Raman spectra (using a 785-nm laser wavelength) in therange of single-wall carbon nanotube radial breathing modes for roped orraw SWNT material at pH 10.

FIG. 13A shows Raman spectra upshifts in the tangential mode peak forlaser oven-produced single-wall carbon nanotubes in the presence ofdifferent protonating acids.

FIG. 13B shows Raman spectra upshifts in the tangential mode peak forHIPCO® single-wall carbon nanotubes in the presence of differentprotonating acids

FIG. 14A shows fluorescence spectra from semiconducting single-wallcarbon nanotubes excited at a wavelength of 350 nm as a function of pH.

FIG. 14B shows fluorescence spectra from semiconducting single-wallcarbon nanotubes excited at a wavelength of 350 nm as a function of pH.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to a process for sorting and separating carbonnanotubes by diameter and chirality type based upon their electronic andoptical properties by dispersing the nanotubes, imparting a charge to aselective fraction of the nanotubes, and separating the nanotubes basedon the nanotubes' net charge. The amount of charge that the nanotube canaccommodate is a function of its electronic structure, diameter andconformation. The invention also relates to sensors comprisingsingle-wall carbon nanotubes, wherein the metallic and semiconductingnanotubes can be separated from a mixture of nanotubes, and the sensingis accomplished by monitoring the sensitive electronic properties of thesemiconducting nanotubes, which are capable of absorbing and luminescingin the near-infrared portion of the electromagnetic spectrum and providea sensitive probe for a wide variety of applications. The electronicproperties of the nanotube are very sensitive to the molecularenvironment and provide the capability of sensing adsorbates, chemicalbonds, dipolar interactions and other fluid properties by perturbationsin the luminescent spectra.

Separation of Different Types of Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes

In one embodiment of the invention, single-wall carbon nanotubes aredispersed in a fluid, such that a certain fraction of the nanotubes havea net charge, and subjected to chromatographic separation in an electricfield. The single-wall carbon nanotubes migrate through the media underthe influence of the electric field at a rate dependent on net charge,structure and chirality of the single-wall carbon nanotube. Thenanotubes of different structure and chirality migrate at differentrates, elute at different times and are collected.

In another embodiment of the invention, single-wall carbon nanotubes aredispersed in a fluid, wherein the pH of the fluid is adjusted so as tocause a certain fraction of single-wall carbon nanotubes to protonateand carry a net electric charge. The nanotube dispersion is thensubjected to an electrophoretic separation under the influence of anelectric field wherein the single-wall carbon nanotubes migrate on amedium or through the fluid under the influence of an electric field ata rate dependent on their structure and chirality. The nanotubes ofdifferent structure and chirality migrate at different rates, elute atdifferent times, and are collected.

In one embodiment, the single-wall carbon nanotubes are first dispersedin a fluid, such as an aqueous system containing a molecule, compound orpolymer capable of wrapping, encapsulating or otherwise isolating thenanotubes from each other. With vigorous agitation and mixing, thenanotubes are dispersed in the aqueous system as individual carbonnanotubes and protected from reaggregation with a coating or wrappingthat does not perturb the electronic properties of the nanotubes. In oneembodiment, dispersal of the nanotubes can be accomplished by applying anon-perturbing coating to the nanotubes in a fluid, wherein the coatingprevents reaggregation and/or bundling of the nanotubes. Shear mixing,sonication, and a combination thereof can be used to vigorously dispersethe nanotubes as individual nanotubes. Since some fraction of thesingle-wall carbon nanotubes in the nanotube dispersion can be in theform of bundles or ropes, the dispersion can be centrifuged in order toseparate the denser bundled, roped nanotubes and impurities from theindividual nanotubes. After centrifugation, individual-dispersednanotubes remain suspended in the supernatant portion of the fluid andcan be decanted.

In yet another embodiment of the invention, single-wall carbon nanotubesare dispersed in an aqueous system wherein the nanotubes are surroundedby a generally non-perturbing coating, such as a micellular arrangementof surfactant molecules. A suspension comprising the nanotubes and thecoating precursor is vigorously agitated in order to coat individualnanotubes, which are subsequently separated from metallic catalystresidues and other carbon forms, such as nanotube ropes and amorphouscarbon. The pH of the individually-dispersed nanotube suspension is madebasic and then acidified to approximately neutral pH so as to protonatea first fraction of single-wall carbon nanotubes. The nanotubedispersion is then subjected to an electric field wherein the protonatedsingle-wall carbon nanotubes diffuse through the fluid under theinfluence of the electric field at a rate dependent on their structureand chirality. The nanotubes of different structure and chirality eluteat different times and are collected. The steps of acidifying theremaining non-protonated portion of the nanotube mixture and separatingin an electric field are repeated step-wise until the entire populationof nanotubes has been protonated and separated by the electric field.

The fluid for dispersing the nanotubes can be water, polar solvents,hydrocarbon, oxygenated hydrocarbon, aminated hydrocarbon, aromatic, orany solvent that is compatible with the non-perturbing coating for thenanotube. Examples of solvents include, but are not limited to water,alcohols, acetic acid, dimethylformamide, and combinations thereof.Preferred solvents are polar solvents and water. Water is the mostpreferred solvent.

Non-perturbing coatings for the single-wall carbon nanotubes arecoatings, molecules or polymers that do not interfere with or negligiblyaffect the electronic structure of the nanotube. For example,non-perturbing coatings that could be used include polymers, such aspolyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP), polystyrene sulfonate (PSS), poly(1-vinylpyrrolidone-co-vinyl acetate) (PVP/VA), poly(1-vinylpyrrolidone-co-acrylic acid), poly(1-vinylpyrrolidone-co-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate), polyvinyl sulfate,poly(sodium styrene sulfonic acid-co-maleic acid), polyethylene oxide(PEO), polypropylene oxide (PPO), dextran, dextran sulfate, bovine serumalbumin (BSA), poly(methyl methacrylate-co-ethyl acrylate), polyvinylalcohol, polyethylene glycol, polyallyl amine, copolymers thereof andcombinations thereof. The polymers can wrap around the nanotubes andrender the nanotubes soluble in water and other compatible solvents.Moreover, the polymer wrapping or coating can be removed withoutaffecting the carbon nanotube structure. Further details of polymerwrapping of single-wall carbon nanotubes can be found in O'Connell, etal., “Reversible Water Solubilization of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubesby Polymer Wrapping,” Chem. Phys. Lett., Vol., pp. 265-271, 2001, and“Polymer-Wrapped Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes,” International Pat. Publ.WO 02/016257, filed Aug. 23, 2001, both of which are incorporated hereinby reference.

Surfactants can also be used as non-perturbing coatings for suspendingindividual single-wall carbon nanotubes. “Surfactants” are generallymolecules having polar and non-polar ends and which commonly position atinterfaces to lower the surface tension between immiscible chemicalspecies. Surfactants can form micellular assemblies with the nanotubesin an appropriate solvent medium. In an aqueous system, the non-polartail of the surfactant molecules will surround the nanotube, with thesurfactant molecules radiating outward from the nanotubes like spokes ona wheel in a micellular-like fashion with the polar end groups on theoutside of the micelle in contact with the aqueous media. Anionic,cationic or nonionic surfactants, with anionic and nonionic surfactantsbeing more preferred, can be used in an appropriate solvent medium.Water is an example of an appropriate solvent medium. Examples ofanionic surfactants include, but are not limited to SARKOSYL® NLsurfactants (SARKOSYL® is a registered trademark of Ciba-Geigy UK,Limited; other nomenclature for SARKOSYL NL surfactants includeN-lauroylsarcosine sodium salt, N-dodecanoyl-N-methylglycine sodium saltand sodium N-dodecanoyl-N-methylglycinate), polystyrene sulfonate (PSS),sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), sodium dodecyl sulfonate (SDSA), sodiumalkyl allyl sulfosuccinate (TREM) and combinations thereof. A preferredanionic surfactant that can be used is sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS).Examples of cationic surfactants that can be used, include, but are notlimited to, dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide (DTAB),cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), cetyltrimethylammonium chloride(CTAC) and combinations thereof. An example of a preferred cationicsurfactant that can be used is dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide.Examples of nonionic surfactants include, but are not limited to,SARKOSYL® L surfactants (also known as N-lauroylsarcosine orN-dodecanoyl-N-methylglycine), BRIJ® surfactants (BRIJ® is a registeredtrademark of ICI Americas, Inc.; examples of BRIJ surfactants arepolyethylene glycol dodecyl ether, polyethylene glycol lauryl ether,polyethylene glycol hexadecyl ether, polyethylene glycol stearyl ether,and polyethylene glycol oleyl ether), PLURONIC® surfactants (PLURONIC®is a registered trademark of BASF Corporation; PLURONIC surfactants areblock copolymers of polyethylene and polypropylene glycol), TRITON®-Xsurfactants (TRITON® is a registered trademark formerly owned by Rohmand Haas Co., and now owned by Union Carbide; examples of TRITON-Xsurfactants include, but are not limited to, alkylaryl polyethetheralcohols, ethoxylated propoxylated C₈-C₁₀ alcohols,t-octylphenoxypolyethoxyethanol, polyethylene glycol tert-octylphenylether, and polyoxyethylene isooctylcyclohexyl ether), TWEEN® surfactants(TWEEN® is a registered trademark of ICI Americas, Inc; TWEENsurfactants include, but are not limited to, polyethylene glycolsorbitan monolaurate (also known as polyoxyethylenesorbitanmonolaurate), polyoxyethylene monostearate, polyoxyethylenesorbitantristearate, polyoxyethylenesorbitan monooleate, polyoxyethylenesorbitantrioleate, and polyoxyethylenesorbitan monopalmitate),polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) and combinations thereof. Preferred nonionicsurfactants that can be used are alkylaryl polyethether alcohols,commercially known as TRITON-X® surfactants.

To facilitate the preparation and dispersion of the single-wall carbonnanotubes into individual tubes, the nanotubes and non-perturbingcoating solution, e.g., the surfactant solution, are subjected tohigh-shear mixing. For clarity and conciseness, surfactant will be usedas an exemplary example of a non-perturbing coating with theunderstanding that the same or similar conditions would apply for othernon-perturbing coatings. To further facilitate dispersion, thenanotube-surfactant solution can be subjected to sonication orultrasonication.

After forming a dispersion of the single-wall carbon nanotubes, theindividually-dispersed nanotubes are separated from those nanotubesdispersed in bundles and from other non-nanotube solids. Centrifugationand ultracentrifugation are suitable means for separating the ropednanotubes and metallic impurities from the individually-dispersednanotubes. With centrifugation, the dispersed nanotube bundles andmetallic catalyst particles, usually with one or more layers ofgraphitic carbon overcoats, concentrate in the sediment at the bottom ofthe centrifuge tubes, while the individually-dispersed nanotubes remainsuspended in the supernatant.

The supernatant contains a variety of individual single-wall carbonnanotube types surrounded by a protective non-perturbing coating. In thecase of a surfactant, the coating can surround the nanotube in amicellular arrangement. In an aqueous media, when anionic surfactantsform micelles, the non-polar tail components point in to the middle ofthe micelle, while the polar heads, with a negative charge, point outand are at the surface of the micelle. When the anionic surfactantsurrounds an individual nanotube, the micellular arrangement is similar,except that a nanotube is in the middle of the micelle, surrounded bythe non-polar tails of the surfactant. The outer portion of thenanotube-encased micelle, as in a conventional micelle in an aqueoussystem, comprises the polar heads of the surfactant.

The individually-dispersed nanotubes can then be separated according tonanotube type. To accomplish the separation, a charge is imparted to thenanotube. In one embodiment, the nanotubes are suspended in an aqueousenvironment wherein the nanotubes are surrounded by a surfactantmolecules arranged in a micellular fashion. In an aqueous system, chargemay be imparted to the nanotube by protonation. Protonation shall bedefined as the close association of a proton (H⁺) near or at the surfaceof the nanotube. Protonation can also encompass ions or other molecularspecies that can associate a proton near or at the surface of thenanotube. For example, a nanotube-encased micelle can be protonated byvarious compounds and ions, including, but not limited to, hydronium ion(H₃O⁺), hydrochloric acid (HCl), hydrofluoric acid (HF), carbonic acid(H₂CO₃), sulfuric acid (H₂SO₄), nitric acid (HNO₃), fluorosulfuric acid(FSO₃H), chlorosulfonic acid (ClSO₃H), methane sulfonic acid (CH₃SO₃H),trifluoromethane sulfonic acid (CF₃SO₃H), oleum (H₂SO₄/SO₃) andcombinations thereof.

Protonation alters the nanotube's chemical reactivity, electronic andoptical properties and mobility in an electric field. Without beinglimited to theory, protonation can be performed selectively according tothe band-gap energy of the nanotube and provides a means of selectingand separating nanotubes by type. The protonation process is readilyreversible so that the carbon nanotubes can be restored to theirpristine state once separation is completed. The separation andisolation of the nanotubes by type permits the concentration ofindividual single-wall carbon nanotubes of the same (n, m) type in orderto produce macroscopic quantities that represent new compositions ofmatter. Macroscopic quantities are defined as a quantity of at leastabout 0.01 μg.

The selective protonation of the different nanotube types can be done bychanging the pH of solution of suspended nanotubes and/or exposure ofthe nanotubes to certain gases, such as CO₂. Under acidic conditions,the selective protonation changes the charge on the nanotubes.Protonation also changes other properties of certain diameter nanotubesrelative to others, hence creating a differential in properties that canbe exploited in separation. Carbon nanotubes of certain types areprotonated preferentially during the protonation process. For example,in a mixture of single-wall carbon nanotubes, the metallic nanotubes areprotonated first, while the smallest diameter nanotubes, having thelargest band-gap energy are the last to be protonated. Changing thecharge on nanotubes as a function of their band-gap energy allowsseparation of the nanotubes by a variety of different means, including,but not limited to, chromatography, electrophoresis, and selectivenon-covalent functionalization, such as, for example, by macromolecularassociation or wrapping of the nanotube.

Selective protonation can be done by suspending the single-wall carbonnanotubes in a solution and decreasing the pH of a solution to a presetvalue. The particular pH value can determine the extent of protonationof the smaller band-gap, metallic nanotubes relative to the larger bandgap, smaller diameter semiconducting nanotubes.

The separation of the nanotubes is based on each nanotube's electronicproperties, which are dependent on and determined by the nanotube'sstructure and chirality. After individually dispersing the nanotubes,the pH of the nanotube dispersion is adjusted to basic conditions abovepH 7. Adjustment of the pH to above basic conditions is convenientlydone with a base, such as sodium hydroxide or Tris base buffer, alsoknown as (Tris-hydroxymethyl)aminomethane. The first fraction ofnanotubes is protonated by lowering the pH to about neutral with theaddition of acid. The metallic nanotubes protonate under near-neutralconditions and, thus, are the first of the nanotubes to protonate. Thesemiconducting nanotubes are not affected. Separation of the firstprotonated fraction is accomplished by subjecting the complete mixtureto an electrophoretic separation. In the presence of an electric field,the protonated nanotubes migrate in the field at different rates,relative to their structure. Under protonation conditions, the nanotubemigration and separation can be monitored by spectroscopic means such asRaman, resonance Raman, absorption, luminescence and combinationsthereof.

For selected nanotubes, near-IR detection can be used to monitor theseparation of the nanotubes. Semiconducting nanotubes have been found toluminesce in the near-infrared. Since the luminescence is not observedunder protonation conditions, monitoring the separation of thesemiconducting nanotubes by near-IR fluorescence can be done bymonitoring the fluorescence of the unprotonated semiconductingnanotubes. Under basic conditions and near-neutral pH, mostsemiconducting nanotubes will remain unprotonated and fluoresce in thenear-IR. As the pH is lowered and certain semiconducting nanotubesprotonate and will not fluoresce. The fluorescence will decrease withprotonation and only be emitted from the non-protonated semiconductingnanotubes. A related method for monitoring the separation of thenanotubes with protonation is to monitor the absorption spectra of thenanotubes.

After sufficient migration time, the protonated nanotubes will separateinto fractions of like-type nanotubes and can be collected for furtheruse. Using tunable Raman spectroscopy or Raman at different wavelengths,each (n, m) type of nanotube from each nanotube fraction can beidentified. Simultaneous and complimentary monitoring of the elution canbe done by collecting absorption and fluorescence spectra of the elutednanotubes. After separation and collection, the protonation can bereversed by the adjusting pH back to basic conditions.

After separation of the first fraction of single-wall carbon nanotubes,the pH of the unprotonated nanotubes is lowered by adding more acid inorder to protonate a second fraction of nanotubes. As the pH is lowered,the semiconducting nanotubes will begin to protonate. In contrast tometallic tubes, semiconducting nanotubes are characterized by having aband gap in energy states. At about pH 5, the smaller band gapsemiconducting nanotubes protonate. The resulting mixture is againsubjected to an electric field wherein the protonated nanotubes migrateat a rate dependent on their structure. After sufficient migration time,the protonated nanotubes will separate into fractions of like-typenanotubes and can be collected for further use. When in the protonatedstate, the separation of the nanotubes into different fractions can bemonitored by variable wavelength Raman and near-IR fluorescence andabsorption spectroscopy. After collection of the different fractions ofsemiconducting nanotubes, the tubes may be typed by variable wavelengthRaman spectroscopy.

Further separation of the mixture of nanotube types can be obtained bydecreasing the pH even further. At lower pH, such as pH 3, thesemiconducting nanotubes with the largest band gap, corresponding to thesmallest diameter semiconducting nanotubes, will protonate. Again, theresulting nanotube mixture is subjected to an electric field andseparated. As with the earlier fractionations, the protonated nanotubesmigrate through the electric field at a rate dependent on theirstructure. After sufficient migration time, the protonated nanotubeswill separate into fractions of like-type nanotubes and can be collectedfor further use. When in the protonated state, Raman and near-IRabsorption and fluorescence spectroscopy can be used to monitor theseparation of the nanotubes into different fractions. After collectionof the different fractions of semiconducting nanotubes, the tubes may betyped using tunable Raman spectroscopy or Raman at differentwavelengths.

In another embodiment, the separation of a mixture of nanotube types canbe done in a step-wise fashion by decreasing the pH to protonate acertain nanotube fraction, applying an electric field to separate theprotonated nanotubes, further decreasing the pH of the non-protonatedfraction so as to protonate another fraction, and applying an electricfield so as to separate a second fraction of protonated nanotubes. Thesteps of lowering of the pH to protonate a portion of the remainingnon-protonated fraction and applying an electric field can be alternateduntil the entire mixture of nanotubes has been protonated and separated.

In another embodiment, the separation of the nanotubes can be done in acontinuous fashion by continuously decreasing the pH while applying anelectric field and collecting the separate nanotube fractions. Theseparation can be monitored by Raman spectroscopy using appropriatewavelengths. The separated nanotubes can be identified by Ramanspectroscopy.

In one embodiment, the nanotubes that have been protonated are separatedby differential migration in an electric field. Examples of this type ofseparation technique includes, but is not limited to, capillaryelectrophoresis, capillary electrochromatography, gel electrophoresis,paper electrophoresis, variations and combinations thereof. Capillaryelectrophoresis (CE) is also known as capillary zone electrophoresis(CZE). In capillary electrophoresis, the sample is added to a capillaryfilled with electrolyte and is exposed to an electric current. Thecharged nanotubes in solution move toward either the anode or thecathode and are also carried through the capillary by electroosmoticflow, the movement of the buffer ions toward one of the electrodes.Thus, the separation can be based on both nanotube charge and size. Incapillary electrochromatography (CEC), the sample is loaded onto acapillary filled with a silica gel stationary phase such that in thepresence of an electrical current, the separation is bothelectrophoretic and chromatographic. Capillary electrophoresis is apreferred embodiment for the separation of protonated nanotubes.Typically, the strength of the electric field is in the range of about0.1 kV and about 30 kV.

In another embodiment, carbon nanotubes can be separated by type byadjusting the pH of a fluid containing a suspension ofindividually-suspended nanotubes by lowering the pH from about 7 toabout 3 in the presence of oxygen to selectively protonate a populationof nanotube types. Metallic nanotubes protonate near neutral conditionsleaving semiconducting nanotubes unaffected. Small band gapsemiconducting nanotubes protonate next as the pH is lowered to about 5.At about pH 3, all remaining semiconducting nanotubes are protonated.

After selective protonation, the nanotubes are separated to removeprotonated or reacted nanotubes from unprotonated or unreactednanotubes. Methods of separation include, but are not limited to,application of an electric field, selective binding, selectiveadsorption, chromatography, and combinations thereof. Capillaryelectrophoresis is a preferred method of separating the nanotubes. Afterseparating the nanotubes, all fractions of nanotubes can be restored totheir pristine state by increasing the pH to basic conditions, such aspH 10, with sodium hydroxide or other appropriate base.

In another embodiment, metallic nanotubes can be separated from amixture of carbon nanotubes by methods using strong acids. Without beinglimited by theory, it appears that strong acids cause preferentialionization of metallic nanotubes, and enable their separation by meansof electrophoretic, differential solvation or differential suspensionmethods. In nonaqueous media, strong acids can be used as the solutionphase. Strong acids preferentially ionize metallic nanotubes and renderthem susceptible to electrophoretic type separations. Examples of strongacids that can be used to preferentially ionize metallic single-wallcarbon nanotubes include, but are not limited to, such acids astrifluoromethane sulfonic acid (CF₃SO₃H), concentrated sulfuric acid(H₂SO₄), hydrochloric acid (HCl), hydrofluoric acid (HF), nitric acid(HNO₃), fluorosulfuric acid (FSO₃H), chlorosulfonic acid (ClSO₃H),methane sulfonic acid (CH₃SO₃H), and oleum (H₂SO₄/SO₃). Eitheras-synthesized or purified single-wall carbon nanotube material can betreated with strong acid and the metallic nanotubes separated using avariety of different techniques including selective solvation of themetallic nanotubes in strong acids, electrodeposition from strong acids,and electromigration in strong acid media to yield high concentrationsof metallic nanotubes separated from the semiconducting types. Thefractions can be precipitated out as separated fractions, washed toremove excess acid and filtered to remove solid matter.

Other embodiments of the process would include optimized parameters todecrease the time required for nanotube separation and the scaledprocess to accommodate large amounts of nanotube material. The initialstarting pH of the sample affects both the time and efficiency of theseparation. Thus, depending on the separation requirements for thedesired application, the initial pH of the starting sample could beacidic, such as pH 5. The pH of the initial nanotube sample could alsobe in the basic range, such as pH 10.

The separation of the nanotubes can be done in a variety of ways inorder to achieve the desired separation. Certain separation conditionsmay be used to facilitate separation of certain tube types. Otherseparation conditions may be employed to expedite the separation orincrease the resolution between separate nanotube types or fractions. Inone embodiment, the separation of the nanotubes can be done at differenttemperatures or the temperature can be ramped throughout the separationof the nanotubes. For example, the separation could be conducted attemperatures in the range of about 10° C. and about 40° C.

In other embodiments, the surfactant media used in the nanotube sampleand the buffer solution can be the same or different. Buffer solutionsof different types and pHs could be used for the separation of thenanotubes. The ionic strength of the nanotube sample and the buffercould be adjusted from that of the suspended mixture to the criticalmicellar concentration of the surfactant. Functionalization of thecapillary wall can also be used to promote selective binding orinteractions with certain nanotube species. The use of an appliedpressure gradient from 0 to 10 psi across the capillary and a ramp inapplied field are other possible embodiments. The field direction canalso be reversed to negative (−) at the injection end and positive (+)at outlet.

Another variation in the separation step includes the type of separationmeans. For example, the nanotubes could be separated by gelelectrophoresis, selective wrapping or binding followed by solventtransfer, chromatography or competitive adsorption of charged anduncharged nanotubes.

Macroscopic amounts of a particular (n, m)-type carbon nanotuberepresent a new composition of matter. Selected nanotube types haveunique and discrete properties that are different than those of mixturesof nanotubes. The properties of matter comprised of such specificnanotubes can be selected and the amounts of the selected nanotubesadjusted to obtain combination of specific nanotube types that providedesired properties. An entire new class of matter is created by sortingthe nanotubes by type, matter whose properties are, in effect,adjustable and tunable.

The invention provides a process for separating individual carbonnanotubes to yield new compositions of matter with new properties. Thenew matter consists of macroscopic amounts of type-sorted single-walledcarbon nanotubes. Generally, macroscopic amounts of type-selectednanotubes could comprise at least about 15% of a selected (n, m) type ofnanotube, i.e., a particular individual (n, m) nanotube type.Preferably, a macroscopic amount would comprise at least about 30% of aparticular individual (n, m) nanotube type. More preferably, themacroscopic amount would comprise at least about 50% of a particularindividual (n, m) nanotube type. More preferably, the macroscopic amountwould comprise at least about 70% of a particular individual (n, m)nanotube type. More preferably, the macroscopic amount would comprise atleast about 90% of a particular individual (n, m) nanotube type. Thetype-selected nanotubes would have a narrow range of electronicproperties or the range of properties could be tuned by strategicallycombining certain amounts of selected types of nanotubes.

In another embodiment, the metallic type nanotubes are separated fromthe semiconducting nanotubes. The metallic nanotubes could, optionally,be further separated according to particular (n, m) types. With orwithout further separation by metallic type, macroscopic amounts ofmetallic nanotubes could be aligned and made into conducting fibers ornanotube wires, the conductivity of which could favorably compete withcopper. A fiber or nanotube wire of a rope or bundle of nanotubes wouldbe conducting if any of the nanotubes in the bundle were metallic andcontacted metallic tubes along the longitudinal axis of the rope orwire. Concentrations of metallic nanotubes of at least about 15% forsuch an application would be preferred. The metallic nanotubes could beseparated from the semiconducting nanotubes such that the resultingmatter, in a macroscopic amount of single-wall carbon nanotubes, wouldcomprise at least about 15% metallic-type nanotubes. Preferably, themacroscopic amount would comprise at least about 30% metallic-typenanotubes. More preferably, the macroscopic amount would comprise atleast about 50% metallic-type nanotubes. More preferably, themacroscopic amount would comprise at least about 70% metallic-typesingle-wall carbon nanotubes. More preferably, the macroscopic amountwould comprise at least about 90% metallic-type single-wall carbonnanotubes. Examples involving methods for making nanotube ropes can befound in “Method of Making Ropes of Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes” U.S.Pat. No. 6,183,714, issued Feb. 6, 2001, which is included herein in itsentirety.

With the ability to separate macroscopic quantities of any single-wallcarbon nanotube type with high specificity, it is possible to use thetype-selected tubes as seeds for growing even more of any selectednanotube type. Examples of a process for growing nanotubes from nanotubeseeds can be found in “Process Utilizing Pre-formed Cluster Catalystsfor Making Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes,” Int. Pat. Publ. WO 02/079082,published Oct. 10, 2002, and which is included herein in its entirety.This technique, in conjunction with those disclosed in the presentapplication, enables bulk production of type-selected single-wall carbonnanotubes. Such production is useful in high volume applications such ascomposite materials where the properties of the material derive at leastin part from the properties of the type-selected nanotubes. Examplesinclude electrically- and thermally-conductive polymer composites.Materials with electrical or electromagnetic response(s) that arederived, at least in part, from the properties of the type-selectednanotubes. Another application enabled by this invention is thelarge-scale fabrication of electrical and electronic circuitry utilizingtype-selected single wall carbon nanotubes. The availability ofmacroscopic amounts of type-specific nanotube material enablesmass-production of nanometer-scale electronic circuitry. Specifictype-selected single-wall carbon nanotubes can serve as an element ofone or more electronic devices, including, but not limited to,interconnections between other devices, resistors, capacitors, diodes,transistors, pass elements, transducers, attenuators, heat transferdevices, memory elements, antennas, thermoelectric devices,piezoelectric devices, microwave circuitry, directional couplers,optoelectronic devices, electrochemical devices, fuel cell electrodes,fuel cell membranes, photoelectric cell electrodes, photoelectric cellactive elements, circuit substrates, and heat conduction elementsassociated with electronic circuitry.

Optical Sensors Utilizing Luminescence of Selected Nanotube Types

Although Raman spectroscopy can be used to determine the particulardiameter and conformation of all (n, m) nanotubes, definitiveidentification of the nanotubes can be done using variable wavelengthRaman spectroscopy or Raman with different wavelengths of incidentradiation, involves tedious and complicated analysis. It is now possibleto expedite the analysis of various (n, m) nanotubes using thenewly-discovered luminescence, and in particular, near-IR fluorescenceof selected single-wall carbon nanotubes. The capability of using thenear-IR region of the electromagnetic spectrum opens a wide variety ofpreviously unknown applications, devices, and uses for nanotubesinvolving sensing and monitoring carbon nanotubes as a function of theirchemical and physical environment. Near-IR fluorescence can be used, forinstance, as a complimentary method to analyze and profile rapidly andto conveniently determine the composition of a mixture of nanotubes.Near-IR fluorescence can also be used in detectors or monitors usingseparated type-selected nanotubes. Alternatively, even withoutseparation, near-IR fluorescence can be used to profile composition ofnanotubes. The latter capability is particularly useful as a rapidmethod for “fingerprinting” as-produced nanotubes, and could be used asquality control technique.

The ability to separate certain (n, m) types or fractions of nanotubes,combined with the facile, versatile and robust capability of near-IRfluorescence detection provides an even broader variety of possibleapplications. Selecting semiconducting nanotubes and using near-IRfluorescence as a convenient, versatile and noninvasive means ofdetection enables the use of nanotubes as sensors for many applications,including in vitro applications in biological systems. Near-IR has thecapability of being able to penetrate biological systems withoutaltering or destroying tissue and, thus, could be used as a convenientnon-invasive method to detect single-wall carbon nanotubes in biologicalsystems.

In contrast to metallic nanotubes, which do not luminesce,semiconducting nanotube types are able to absorb radiation and luminescein the near-IR. Note that luminescence can encompass fluorescence,phosphorescence, photoluminescence, other forms of optical emission,thermoluminescence, electroluminescence and combinations thereof. Forsemiconducting nanotubes, the diameter and chirality of the nanotubedetermine the electronic band-gap and hence the wavelength at which thenanotube will absorb incident photons and exhibit photoluminescence.Because nanotube luminescence is highly dependent on the electronicenvironment of the nanotube, the semiconducting nanotubes are verysensitive probes for monitoring and sensing changed electronic orchemical environment for a wide variety of different applications anduses. Additionally, the semiconducting nanotubes can be derivatized insuch a manner, such as on one or both ends with one or more functionalgroups, such that the nanotube preserves its electronic signature. Thefunctionalized nanotubes, due to the luminescent properties of thesemiconducting structure, can be used as indicators in systems where thefunctional group may congregate, react or be preferentially absorbed.

To optimize the use of type-selected nanotubes and provide for the rapiddetection of the selected semiconducting nanotubes, the excitation andfluorescence emission frequencies have been correlated with Raman shiftsusing variable laser frequencies to determine the correspondence foreach particular (n, m) tube type. Although the emission frequenciesappear to be all in the near-IR portion of the electromagnetic spectrum(i.e., wavelengths in the range of 700 nm and 2000 nm), the excitationfrequencies can range from the near-IR, through the visible (i.e.,wavelengths in the range of 400 nm and 700 nm), and, even into theultraviolet portion of the electromagnetic spectrum (i.e., wavelengthsin the range of about 300 nm and about 400 could be used for excitationof some small diameter semiconducting nanotubes.). Details of thestructure assignment determinations and theory are given in Bachilo, etal., “Structure-Assigned Optical Spectra of Single-Walled CarbonNanotubes,” Science, Vol. 298, Dec. 20, 2002, p. 2361-2365, which isincluded herein by reference in its entirety. Table 1 give the emissionand excitation frequencies for selected (n, m) semiconducting nanotubesand correlation with their predicted and observed Raman radial breathingmode frequencies (ν_(RBM)). TABLE 1 Spectral data and assignments forselected semiconducting SWNTs λ₁₁(nm) λ₂₂(nm) hν₁₁(eV) hν₂₂(eV)Assignment Predicted Observed emission excitation emission excitation(n, m) type ν_(RBM)(cm⁻¹)* ν_(RBM)(cm⁻¹) 833 483 1.488 2.567  (5, 4)372.7 373† 873 581 1.420 2.134  (6, 4) 335.2 912 693 1.359 1.789  (9, 1)307.4 952 663 1.302 1.870  (8, 3) 298.1 297‡ 975 567 1.272 2.187  (6, 5)307.4 1023 644 1.212 1.925  (7, 5) 281.9 283‡ 1053 734 1.177 1.689 (10,2) 265.1 264§ 1101 720 1.126 1.722  (9, 4) 256.4 1113 587 1.114 2.112 (8, 4) 278.3 1122 647 1.105 1.916  (7, 6) 262.1 264§ 1139 551 1.0882.250  (9, 2) 289.7 1171 797 1.059 1.556 (12, 1) 237.0 236♂ 1172 7161.058 1.732  (8, 6) 243.7 1197 792 1.036 1.565 (11, 3) 232.8 233¶ 1244671 0.997 1.848  (9, 5) 241.4 1250 633 0.992 1.959 (10, 3) 251.1 251‡1250 786 0.992 1.577 (10, 5) 225.1 225¶ 1263 611 0.982 2.029 (11, 1)256.4 1267 728 0.979 1.703  (8, 7) 228.9 1307 859 0.949 1.443 (13, 2)211.9 1323 790 0.937 1.569  (9, 7) 214.9 215¶ 1342 857 0.924 1.447 (12,4) 207.5 1372 714 0.904 1.736 (11, 4) 221.5 1376 685 0.901 1.810 (12, 2)227.0 1380 756 0.898 1.640 (10, 6) 213.4 1397 858 0.887 1.445 (11, 6)200.8 1414 809 0.877 1.533  (9, 8) 203.4 1425 927 0.870 1.337 (15, 1)193.6 1474 868 0.841 1.428 (10, 8) 192.5 1485 928 0.835 1.336 (13, 5)187.2 1496 795 0.829 1.559 (12, 5) 198.3 1497 760 0.828 1.631 (13, 3)203.4 1555 892 0.797 1.390 (10, 9) 183.3*Using the expression ν_(RBM) = [223.5/d_(t)(nm)] + 12.5 and assuming aC—C bond distance of 0.144 nm†Raman excitation wavelength 830 nm.‡Raman excitation wavelengths 633 nm and 636 to 672 nm.§Raman excitation wavelength 1064 nm.♂Raman excitation wavelength 782 nm.¶Raman excitation wavelength 785 nm.

After establishing the identities of selected (n, m) nanotubes bycorrelations, such as given above, absorption and n-IR fluorescence canbe used as spectroscopic means to monitor the separation of thenanotubes by selective protonation or other separation means. If near-IRfluorescence is used with selective protonation, the unprotonatedsemiconducting nanotubes will fluoresce. If the semiconducting nanotubehas been protonated, the protonation of the nanotube can be reversed tohigher pH conditions, such as by the addition of NaOH in order toobserve fluorescence. Besides the ability to rapidly identify individualnanotube types, the near-IR fluorescence can be used to characterize ananotube mixture without separating the individual fractions ofnanotubes. In this embodiment, the nanotubes are dispersed in a liquidmedia with a polymer, surfactant or other molecule that can coat andisolate the nanotubes. The suspension is vigorously agitated, such as byshear mixing, sonication or combinations thereof, so that individualnanotubes are coated and suspended. The individually-suspended nanotubesare separated from ropes of nanotubes and other denser species bycentrifugation, where the individually-suspended nanotubes remain in thesupernatant. By scanning the supernatant recovered from centrifugationwith appropriate excitation frequencies, the composition (i.e., identityand quantity) of the semiconducting nanotubes in a particular sample canbe determined. This procedure could be used as a rapid method forcharacterizing nanotube samples as they are produced, such as a qualitycontrol tool.

The semiconducting nanotubes' ability to fluoresce in the near-IRoptical frequency range provides a highly versatile and rapid detectionmethod, enabling new, far-reaching areas of sensing and detecting, evenas a non-destructive, or minimally invasive, sensor in biologicalsystems. One of the advantages of being able to use excitation radiationand detect emission radiation in the near-IR is the ability to penetratebiological systems so that probes, sensors and detectors with nanotubescan be used in biological systems, including cells, tissues, interfacialmembranes, and even living organisms.

In one embodiment, a plurality of single-wall carbon nanotubes is mixedwith a polymer, surfactant or other moiety capable of isolating thenanotubes from interacting with each other. The mixture is vigorouslyagitated in order to coat or wrap the nanotubes with the isolatingcoating. The mixed system is centrifuged in order to aggregate bundlesor ropes of nanotubes and other impurities in the sediment, while theindividually-coated single-wall carbon nanotubes remain in thesupernatant and can be decanted. Optionally, the nanotubes may beseparated by (n, m) type or separated into fractions comprising groupsof (n, m) nanotubes. Preferably, the semiconducting nanotubes areseparated from the metallic nanotubes by protonating the metallic tubes,subjecting the mixture to an electrophoretic separation, wherein themetallic nanotubes migrate in the electric field and are separated fromthe semiconducting tubes. The semiconducting tubes, either as a group ofmixed semiconducting tubes, or as further separated subsets ofsemiconducting tubes, or even as an individual (n, m) typesemiconducting tube, can be used in various applications using near-IRfluorescence as a detector for semiconducting nanotubes.

The spectral properties of the nanotubes, and particularly theluminescence properties, are highly sensitive to their nanoscaleenvironment. Chemical adsorbates on the nanotubes can alter thesespectral properties and, consequently, the semiconducting nanotubesprovide a sensitive optical sensing means for adsorbed gases, liquidsand solids. The nanotubes are responsive to chemically, as well asphysically, bound substituents, and can be used to sense generalconditions of their environment, such as, but not limited to, pH,temperature, flow, pressure and changes in fluid dynamics andcomposition. They can also receive optical excitation and deliverelectronic and thermal energy to their environment, such as byelectrical and/or thermal luminescence.

The nanotubes are also self-monitoring, in that they are sensitive totheir own condition and degree of association, and can sense conditions,such as, but not limited to, enclosure within a micelle in watersuspension, encapsulation by a wrapped polymer, protein, or DNA, andintercalation by other materials such as acids. The nanotubes arespectrally sensitive to self-association with different tube types. Forexample, if metallic SWNTs are in proximity with semiconducting SWNTs,not only will the luminescence response of the semiconducting nanotubesbe markedly reduced, but also the absorption and Raman spectra will alsobe altered. Even when separated by nanometers, nanotubes can sense thisproximity with each other by dipole-dipole coupling, such that theluminescence characteristics of the nanotubes can be affected. Sinceeach type of nanotube behaves uniquely in its environment, the use of avariety of different types of SWNTs can provide a matrix of data aboutthe environment.

Due to their small nanometer size, type-selected semiconductingsingle-wall carbon nanotubes in a sensor device can sense conditions vianon-invasive or minimally invasive optical probes. A light source in theUV, visible or near-IR provides for excitation of the nanotubes.Preferably, the light source is in the near-IR. The light source can beconducted by an optical fiber. The emitted or light returning from thenanotubes is detected by wavelength sensitive means and is subjected tospectral analysis. The spectral information obtained in turn providesinformation about the nanotubes and the chemical and physicalenvironment.

In one embodiment, carbon nanotubes, that have beenindividually-dispersed and isolated so that they are not in contact withother nanotubes, and, optionally, type-selected, are suspended in aliquid inside a vessel such as, but not limited to, a capillary flowtube or mixing chamber in a microfluidics device. The vessel is fittedwith a window or structure transparent to light, including that of thenear infrared.

A light source, such as a conventional source, or a laser, such as adiode laser, is used to deliver light to the vessel containing thesuspended nanotubes via optical fibers and/or conventional optics. Aslight strikes the nanotubes, the nanotubes absorb some of the light, andthe semiconducting nanotubes become luminescent and emit fluorescentlight. The transmitted light also contains spectral information aboutthe nanotube environment.

The luminescent light is collected by optical fibers and/or conventionaloptics, and delivered to a spectrometer for spectral analysis. Thevarious emitted wavelengths are detected and a spectrum is recorded in acomputer. Similar apparatus setups can also be used to obtain spectralinformation from Raman scattering and from absorption spectral analysis.

One embodiment of a suitable apparatus for detecting and sensingadsorbed and dissolved gases, such as carbon dioxide, isolatedsingle-wall carbon nanotubes dispersed in an aqueous media. A diodelaser emitting red light in the range of 780 to 790 nm is transmitted byan optical fiber and focused into a vessel outfitted with an opticallytransparent means. Many silica-based glasses are suitable for thispurpose. The vessel contains encapsulated carbon nanotubes, such as insodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) micelles, prepared that at least some, areindividually (i.e., not as ropes or bundles) suspended in water. Theresultant fluorescence and Raman scattered light is collected by anoptical lens and transmitted through one or more optical fibers to aspectrometer. The scattered laser light is rejected by a filter means.The emitted light is dispersed and detected by an array detector, suchas an Indium-Gallium-Arsenide (InGaAs) detector, or a charged-coupleddevice (CCD) camera. The electronic signal is recorded by a computer soas to correlate the intensity of the emitted light as a function ofwavelength or frequency shift in the case of Raman scattering.

The emitted light comprises a spectrum of fluorescent features, orpeaks, extending from about 870 nm to about 1400 nm. Various diameternanotubes emit various wavelengths, with the larger diameter nanotubesgenerally emitting longer wavelengths. When molecules adsorb onto thewalls of the nanotube, these spectra features are altered. The longerwavelength features are generally altered first, as the concentration ofthe adsorbate molecules increases.

As with many molecular species, when carbon dioxide, used here as anexample of an absorbed gas, is present in the water, the fluorescencespectra being acquired will be altered. For lower concentrations, thelonger wavelength emission derived from the larger nanotubes diminishesfirst, and is monotonically decreasing with increasing concentration. Asthe concentration increases, the longer wavelength fluorescence isextinguished. The shorter wavelength fluorescence from the smallernanotubes then diminishes with increasingly high concentration. Thesignal intensities are compared to a reference spectrum for nanotubewithout the adsorbed gas. The concentration of the carbon dioxideadsorbate, or other gases or liquids, can then be determined. Since thespectral properties change as a water suspension of SWNTs is exposed tovarying levels of dissolved carbon dioxide, the nanotubes provide thebasis for a quantitative sensor.

Like devices and procedures can be used to measure the compositions ofnanotube samples and the surrounding environmental conditions, such as,but not limited to factors of acidity, concentrations of dissolvedgases, liquids, and solids, temperature, etc.

The SWNT sensor can be used as a chemical “nose” to monitor adsorbatessuch as ozone, carbon dioxide, ammonia, halogens, nitrogen oxides,oxygen, and other rather reactive species that can also be environmentalpollutants in air and water. The SWNT sensors can also be used inmicro-reactor, microfluidic, microelectronic applications, as cellularbased chemical sensors, sensors in lipid bilayers, sensors at catalystsurfaces, sensors attached or interacting with enzymes. Furthermore, theSWNT sensors can be used to monitor dissolved liquids, especially thoseprone to electron donor-acceptor bonding or hydrogen bonding, such asketones, alcohols, ethers, carboxylic acids, esters, amides,hydroxyl-containing molecules, and substituted aromatic compounds. Theycan also be used to monitor dissolved or suspended solid materials suchas polymers and to monitor the binding of metallic species which mayalso act as quenchers.

Some embodiments of the present invention are directed toward chemicalapplications where SWNT sensors provide an optical titration monitor asacid, base, or any other reactant is added and consumed. In otherembodiments, the SWNT sensors provide an in-situ monitor to trackreaction progress. In some embodiments of the present invention, a knownvariety of SWNT sizes can be used as a multi-wavelength sensor for pH,flow, temperature, oxidation potential, and alterations due to exposureto light. In some embodiments, molecules that are not adsorbed on thenanotube can be detected by overtone quenching of the energy transferbetween separated nanotubes. In yet another embodiment, the degree ofalignment in a polymer by polarization of scattered light could bemonitored using selected nanotubes as probes or polymer intercalants.

Methods of using SWNT sensors/probes can include biomedicalapplications. Such applications benefit from the fact that living tissueand cellular matter are essentially transparent to light with frequencyin the near infrared (NIR). These methods are largely microscaleapplications of the chemical applications described above. These methodsinclude measuring the change in fluorescence intensity and/or lifetimedue to chromophores on adjacent proteins, nucleic acids otherchromophores. Spectrally absorbing species, especially with largechromophores, such as those containing porphyrins will be detectable bythe altered the fluorescence. Other biomedical applications involvecytometry type sorting based on the fluorescence signal. SWNTs in adroplet with adherent proteins, cells, etc. show a changed lifetime orintensity and may be selected and separated. In still other embodimentsof the present invention, carbon nanotubes can be attached to amonoclonal antibody and luminescence spectroscopy can be used to monitorthe degree of nanotube localization. A pulsed IR laser can then be usedfor selective thermal denaturation and localized damage to malignancies.

In embodiments of the present invention, carbon nanotubes can be used tomeasure surfactant concentration. Carbon nanotube monitors can yieldvery accurate information concerning drug delivery, transport andmicelle interactions based upon the SDS response in these cases. Inembodiments wherein the SWNT sensors are mounted on a porous membrane tocreate a flow-through device, the concentration of surfactant,counter-ions, and electrolyte in general can be detected continuously inreal-time. This permits the monitoring of fluid mixing, flow, sheareffects, laminar behavior, and gas flux across a membrane.

Methods of using the SWNT sensors can further include monitoring SWNTconditions. Such sensors can be used to determine nanotube type,diameter, chirality, length, as well as the distribution of suchcharacteristics in an aggregation, bundle, rope, fiber or film. The SWNTsensors can be used to determine the presence of adsorbates,contamination, chemically bound species, oxidation, metal catalyst,other fullerenic species, other carbon contamination, purity, long rangeorder and disorder, and excited electron scattering species. The SWNTsensors can be used to determine the presence and amount ofintercalating species in ropes, films, and bundles of nanotubes. Theycan be used to determine the degree of alignment of nanotube fibers andfilms by polarized Raman and Rayleigh scattering. They can be used todetermine degree of self-association, and the presence of metallicnanotubes aggregated with semiconducting nanotubes. They can be used tomonitor the degree to which SWNTs are “wrapped” with polymer orincorporated into an anionic micelle such as SDS, a cationic micellesuch as dodecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide, or a neutral micelle such asTriton-X. They can also be used to monitor the presence of anyelectron-donor acceptor (EDA) or hydrogen-bonded reversibly-adsorbedspecies.

Carbon nanotube sensors can be used to measure, monitor and optimize anumber of SWNT processing conditions. These include finding optimalsonication times, temperature and environment, monitoring separationprocesses such as adsorption on a substrate, high-performance liquidchromatography (HPLC) separations, membrane-based separations, solventextraction, phase inversion, and magnetic separations.

Additionally, other, more varied methods of using SWNT sensors includemonitoring the efficacy of electrophoresis, electrostatic separation,chromatography, HPLC (High Performance Liquid Chromatography),supercritical fluid chromatography, gas chromatography, and magneticchromatography; and using nanotubes individually or in thin films orfibers as electroluminescent sources for sensing, communications, orcomputing, and as photoconductive solids for optically active circuitelements for sensing applications. Wavelength-selected light can be usedto protect the nanotubes with the corresponding absorption fromprotonation so that it can be selectively wrapped with PVP or anothermaterial. This selected-diameter nanotube is then physically separatedfrom the mixture of other nanotubes. Selective absorption of laserlight, especially pulsed laser light, can disrupt micelles and polymerwrapping which can in turn lead to selective flocking. In otherembodiments of the present invention, selected diameters and types ofSWNTs are placed in a transparent matrix (such as polymers like PVP orglasses), or in a thin film, which can be used as fluorescent andabsorption filters, especially in the near infrared, with the selectionof nanotube types that determine the wavelength(s) that are transmitted.Such a filter made with a single type of SWNT with the correspondingabsorption band can be used as a laser line blocker.

The SWNT sensors can also be dispersed individually in a liquid. Theycan also be made to “float” in a gaseous environment. In otherembodiments, the SWNT sensors are “anchored” to a substrate in either arandom or oriented manner. If oriented, they can be parallel to thesubstrate, perpendicular to the substrate, or combinations of the two.These can rely on only one nanotube or rely on a plurality of nanotubes.

The small size, chemical inertness, and physical robustness of thecarbon nanotubes makes these useful as in situ probes for micro- andnanoscale fluid containing devices, as well as for a living cell. When atransparent means is integral to the vessel being probed, such as a cellwall, then no additional transparent means need be added. In suchcircumstances, a single carbon nanotube may be sufficient as the sensor.The optical fiber may then be directly coupled to the vessel without anintervening lens. A single mode optical fiber provides the mosteffective delivery and return of light from a small volume, and in thiscase the same optical fiber can serve both functions. As an example of amicroscale application, the “breathing” of a single cell might bemonitored.

In embodiments of the present invention, the SWNT(s) may be anchoredonto an end of an optical fiber, rather than being in suspension in theliquid being probed. In this form, it constitutes an “optrode,” oroptical sensing probe. A viable cell whose metabolism is altered bybiological materials in the surrounding solution will change itsgeneration of carbon dioxide and this can be sensed by the optrode. Inthis application, there may be clusters or aggregates of like SWNTs forincreased sensitivity. It is preferable that aggregates of dissimilarnanotubes be kept separate to minimize energy transfer. Such aggregatesshould preferably be somewhat porous so as to allow intercalation andcirculation of the fluid being probed. An alternative embodimentutilizes dissimilar, but non-quenching nanotubes to “funnel” excitationto one type of SWNT which will draw on the excitation energy of thesurrounding nanotubes and will exhibit considerably enhanced signal,concentrated in a single wavelength peak, compared to its ownexcitation. This will allow the substitution of a single detector inplace of the camera and disperser.

The optical device may also function on the principle of absorption,rather than emission. In these embodiments, the light source isbroadband or “white light,” rather than a laser. In some, the lightpassing through the optical fiber can undergo attenuated total internalreflection (ATR) in a prismatic means at the probe end of the opticalfiber. Carbon nanotubes attached to or near the reflecting surfaces ofthe prism optrode absorb some of the wavelengths, which varies accordingto the type and concentration of adsorbates. The altered spectral signalreturns up the optical fiber, and into a spectrometer means, and thesignal is processed in a computer. The type and concentration ofdissolved matter in the fluid is then determined. The ATR surface maycomprise part of the fluid enclosure of the vessel, or may have abiological cell(s) attached to it, or it may be placed in contact withtissue that have nanotubes incorporated.

In certain embodiments, the probe may be an optical fiber with the lightpropagating in the core and the cladding thinned or removed to allow anevanescent wave to propagate into the medium to be probed. The signallight passes back into the source optical fiber, or an adjacent opticalfiber. The optical fiber has nanotubes either attached to its surface,or in the surrounding medium to be monitored. The light conducting meansmay also be hollow or tubular, with a fluid flowing through and at leastpartially surrounded by the evanescent wave of the excitation light.

In further embodiments, the nanotubes may also provide a light source inthe near infrared. Thin film assemblies of like nanotubes can be made toprovide narrowband infrared luminescence with an electric current. Theluminescence wavelength will correspond to that seen for opticallyexcited fluorescence. Mixtures of nanotube types can alter the spectralemission. These devices can provide useful light sources for sensing,optical communication, and computing applications. They comprise atunable or wavelength adjustable infrared laser source. Excitation ofsuch light sources can be by laser, lamp, LED illumination, orelectro-luminescence or direct electrical excitation from analternating, inductively coupled, or direct current passing through theSWNT. Use of shorter wavelength lasers, such as the frequency-doubledNd:YAG laser at 532 nm, and the argon ion at 514 or 488 nm enhances thesensitivity to metallic SWNTs. Pulsed illumination or high frequencymodulation will be utilized for lifetime measurements.

In other embodiments, monitoring the Raman frequency shift, as well asthe intensity changes, can be used to sense the surrounding chemicalenvironment. This appears to be especially suitable for use as a monitorof oxidation and reduction, with the frequency shift increasing foroxidation (electron charge withdrawal) of the nanotube. The G′two-phonon peak decreases with the degree of sidewall association.

In methods of using the SWNT sensor devices of the current invention,there are many additional locations for the carbon nanotube sensors,such as: (a) fixed, anchored on substrate; (b) fixed on the end of anoptical fiber “optrode;” (c) fixed to electrical conductor and currentsource for electro-luminescence; (d) SWNTs bound to an electrodesurface; (e) floating in gas stream, injected by electrospray, or bylaser ablative suspension, where they are then airborne and can probethe gas stream for adsorbates; (f) embedded in porous polymer matrix assupport for liquid or gas (i.e., gases flowing through then alter thefluorescence as they adhere to the nanotubes and this will make thepolymer more conductive if metallic tubes are used); (g) nanotubes onaerogels and low density supports for high surface area gas sensors, and(h) embedded in an inorganic (e.g., ceramic) matrix for high temperaturesensors.

In other embodiments, light and heat may be used to clean and restorethe sensing capability on the nanotubes. For many of these cases,ultraviolet and/or light flash desorption can remove adsorbates. Carbonnanotubes and light can be used to generate gases, such as hydrogen, andpromote boiling.

Besides single-wall carbon nanotubes, nanotube separation and sensorsbased on near-IR absorption and fluorescence should be considered to beapplicable to multiwall carbon nanotubes, as well as other nanotubeswith extensive pi cloud conjugation, such as those made of boronnitride. Double-wall carbon nanotubes are an example of a multiwallcarbon nanotube. In this case, there is a statistical probability of1/9th that both nanotube shells will be metallic, 4/9ths that bothshells will be semiconducting, and 4/9ths that one shell will besemiconducting and one shell metallic. Nanotubes with at least onemetallic tube ( 5/9ths of total) are expected to behave like metallicnanotubes and not exhibit fluorescence, leaving 4/9ths of the totalhaving the possibility of exhibiting near-IR fluorescent behavior. Theeconomics and availability of double-wall nanotubes and other multiwallnanotubes could provide cost-effective sensors for certain sensorapplications.

Because these devices and apparatus are based on newly discoverednear-infrared photoluminescence of carbon nanotubes, they are the firstdevices to exploit that photoluminescence. This luminescence waspreviously unknown, and it is expected that therefore substantially allsuch applications utilizing photoluminescence described here will benovel. The invention utilizes single walled carbon nanotubes that byappropriate preparation, also provide unusually distinctly sharpabsorption and resonance Raman spectroscopic features; it is expectedthat therefore many such applications described here will also be hovel.These nanotubes are physically, chemically, and optically very robust.They will allow for the development of a wide variety of in situ andnon-invasive sensors and chemical “noses”, suitable for use inmicrofluidics and biomedical applications.

The carbon nanotubes have been appropriately separated and prepared, andare suspended in a liquid inside a vessel such as a capillary flow tubeor mixing chamber in a microfluidics device. The vessel is fitted with awindow or structure transparent to light, including the near infrared.

One embodiment of the invention is a device comprised of a narrowband orbroadband light source, an optical means of delivering the light, avessel which may be fitted with an optically transparent window orregion with one or more SWNTs anchored or freely suspended in the mediumto be monitored and capable of receiving the light, a optical means tocollect the light and transmit it to a spectrometer, a wavelengthselective instrument capable of selecting one or more wavelengths oflight utilizing dispersion, interferometric, or other means, a lightsensitive detector, array detector, or a CCD detector capable ofdetecting light in the near infrared region of the spectrum andconverting it to an electrical signal, and a computer for recording andanalyzing the signal.

Devices that rely on disaggregated single-walled carbon nanotubes canrequire special preparation. The micelle suspensions, or nanotubeswrapped with PVP or other polymers may tend to come out of suspensionunder some circumstances. For free-floating sensor applications, it maybe necessary to filter out the nanotubes in a subsequent step.

Many other changes in the chemical conditions can also be sensed withthe use of a luminescent probe. Some examples include, but are notlimited to, monitoring other dissolved gases, determining the presenceof other liquids, such as alcohols and ketones dissolved in the water,and sensing dissolved solids. Changes in photoconductivity of thenanotubes can also be considered as adsorbates come in near contact withthe nanotubes by comparing changes peak ratios in the near-IRfluorescence and visible with varying adsorption.

The following examples are included to demonstrate preferred embodimentsof the invention. It should be appreciated by those of skill in the artthat the techniques disclosed in the examples which follow representtechniques discovered by the inventor to function well in the practiceof the invention, and thus can be considered to constitute preferredmodes for its practice. However, those of skill in the art should, inlight of the present disclosure, appreciate that many changes can bemade in the specific embodiments which are disclosed and still obtain alike or similar result without departing from the spirit and scope ofthe invention.

EXAMPLE 1

This example demonstrates the preparation of a dispersion of individualsingle-wall carbon nanotubes in a fluid media and the detection offluorescence from semiconducting-type single-wall carbon nanotubes. RawHIPCO® single-wall carbon nanotube product (HIPCO is a registeredtrademark owned by Carbon Nanotechnologies, Inc., Houston, Tex.), from ahigh-temperature, high-pressure CO disproportionation process wasdispersed in 200 mls of aqueous 1 wt % sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)surfactant solution by high-shear mixing (Polyscience X-520) for onehour. The resulting dispersion was treated in a cup-horn sonicator (ColePalmer CPX-600) for 10 minutes at a power level of 540 W. Immediatelyfollowing sonication, samples were centrifuged (Sovall 100S DiscoveryUltracentrifuge with Surespin 630 swing bucket rotor) at 122,000 g for 4hours. The upper 75% to 80% of supernatant was then carefully decanted,giving micelle-suspended nanotube solutions at a typical massconcentration of 20 to 25 mg/liter. For some experiments, these nanotubesamples were further processed for competitive wrapping with a polymerby adding about 1 wt % of 40 kDa poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) to the SDSsuspension. Analysis of samples by atomic force microscopy showed mostnanotubes to be about 80 to about 200 nm long, with an average length of130 nm. This length distribution is typical of heavily sonicatedfullerene nanotubes from a wide range of sources and is believed toarise from sonication-induced tube cutting. However, spectra of thesesamples, including Raman features, such as strong radial breathing modes(RBM) and the near absence of the “disorder peak” near 1330 cm⁻¹,strongly suggest that this sonication has not substantially damaged thetube side walls. TEM, X-ray diffraction, and RBM Raman measurementsindicate tube diameters between 0.7 and 1.1 nm, typical of HiPcosingle-wall carbon nanotube diameters.

FIG. 2 shows an individual single-wall carbon nanotube encased in onepossible configuration of a closed-packed columnar sodium dodecylsulfate(SDS) micelle, which has a specific gravity of approximately 1.0,whereas the specific gravity of an SDS-coated 7-nanotube bundle would beapproximately 1.2. In centrifugation, nanotube bundles of nanotubes and3 to 5 nm diameter residual iron catalyst particles, each overcoatedwith one or two atomic layers of carbon, with a density of about 2 to 3g/cm³, congregate at the bottom of the centrifuge tube, leaving asupernatant highly enriched in individual nanotubes, even in D₂O(density 1.1 g/cm³).

The SDS suspension of individual nanotubes was found to be much morestable than suspensions of nanotube bundles produced by mildersonication. Samples containing 20 mg/liter of nanotubes in 1 wt % SDSsurvived heating to 70° C., addition of up to 40% methanol, NaClconcentrations up to 200 mM, and MgCl₂ concentrations up to 10 mM forperiods of greater than 24 hours without flocculation.

EXAMPLE 2

This example demonstrates the effect of changing the pH of a suspensionof single-wall carbon nanotubes in a 1 wt % sodium dodecyl sulfate(99.9%, Sigma-Aldrich) (SDS)/D₂O(99.9%, Cambridge Isotope Lab.)solution. The surfactant suspended single-walled carbon nanotubes weremonitored using Raman, absorption and fluorescence spectroscopy as thesolution pH is lowered from about pH 10.3 down to about 3.8 and cycledback to pH 10. Aliquots of 1 N NaOH or HCl (Fisher Scientific) wereadded to equilibrate to the desired pH. Titrations were performed in anopen, stirred three-necked 250 ml flask exposed to air. Equilibrationwas confirmed by monitoring transient changes in the tangential mode ofthe Raman spectrum. Raman spectroscopy was performed in-situ using aKaiser Process Raman Spectrometer (Kaiser Optical Inc.) with 20 mW laserintensity focused on the solution in the flask. Excitation wavelengthsof 532 and 785 nm were employed. A 1 ml sample of solution was removedfrom the flask at each equilibrated pH and the absorbance spectrum wasrecorded with a Shimadzu UV-3101 Scanning spectrophotometer. As the pHwas lowered, Raman features, absorption and fluorescence decreaseselectively. A series of Raman spectra are given in FIGS. 3A through 3G.Small band-gap semiconducting nanotubes are protonated first (see FIG.3D) before larger band-gap, smaller diameter semiconducting nanotubes(see FIGS. 3E and 3F). With the addition of 0.1 N NaOH base to increasethe pH back to 10.3 (see FIG. 3H), the sample appears restored to theinitial non-protonated state, as shown in FIG. 3A. The absorbancespectra are shown in FIG. 4A where the absorption spectra are offsetfrom pH 8 (line 405) by a constant value to show changes (pH 6, −0.1(line 404); pH 5.4, −0.2 (line 403); pH 5.1, −0.3 (line 402); pH 2.5,−0.4.(line 401)). FIG. 4B shows a plot of absorbance as a function of pHfor two particular semiconducting nanotubes, namely (13,3) and (10,2)nanotubes (lines 406 and 407, respectively).

EXAMPLE 3

This example demonstrates a method to separate a mixture of as-producedsingle-wall carbon nanotubes by type using selective charge transfer andcapillary electrophoresis. As-produced HIPCO® single-wall carbonnanotube material (produced by high temperature, high pressuredisproportionation of CO), was mixed with a solution of 1 wt % sodiumdodecyl sulfate (SDS) anionic surfactant in water, ultrasonicated at 540W and placed in an ultracentrifuge and rotated with a force of 122,000g. The supernatant, containing a homogeneous mixture of a distributionof different types of individual single-wall carbon nanotubes, ratherthan as aggregated bundles, or “ropes,” was decanted. The ionic strengthof the decant was adjusted to about 70 mM using excess SDS surfactant.The nanotube-SDS solution was acidified to effect nanotube protonationby adding concentrated HCl. The pH after HCl addition was pH 3. Theionic strength of the nanotube sample was adjusted and placed in asolution containing controlled amounts of surfactant, electrolyte andcounter-ions at the desired ionic strength.

A Tris buffer solution at pH 8 was prepared with Tris base((Tris-hydroxymethyl) aminomethane) (Mol. Wt. 121.1) to have a nearlymatching ionic strength (70 mM) of the nanotube/surfactant decantsolution through the addition of excess SDS surfactant.

A sample of the acidified nanotube/SDS (pH 3) solution was injected intoa fused silica capillary tube (75 micron inner diameter, 375 micronouter diameter, and 50 cm in length) by applying 0.5 psi pressure to thesolution for 15 seconds to fill about 1.7 cm of the capillary with thesample. Each end of the capillary was placed in separate bufferreservoirs, i.e. vessels (about 2 ml in volume) each filled with theTris buffer solution.

An electric field (not exceeding 120 V/cm) was applied across thecapillary which was held at constant temperature 25° C. by thermostaticcontrol. The field was applied by placing platinum-coated electrodesinto each buffer reservoir at either end of the capillary. A positive(+) potential was applied at the inlet end and a negative (−) potentialis applied at the outlet end of the capillary. The electric field wasramped from zero to the operating strength of 5 kV over a 2 minuteperiod and held constant for about 2.5 hours.

The protonated nanotubes flowed towards the negatively-charged electrodeby electro-osmotic flow. The nanotubes migrated at different rates inthe electric field based on their electric charge. The nanotubesseparated (based on type) as they migrated with the induced flow whilesimultaneously being retarded based on variation in net charge.

Nanotube migration and separation were monitored by Raman scattering andnear-IR fluorescence. Since only non-protonated semiconducting nanotubeswill fluoresce, near-IR fluorescence can be observed for thesemiconducting nanotubes until the pH is low enough to protonate them.FIGS. 5 through 9 show the evolution of the separation of nanotubes atpH 5 under the influence of the electric field at different elapsedtimes. In the absence of an electric field and only a pressure gradient,no nanotube sample separation was observed, such as shown in FIG. 5,where the sample migrated through the capillary as a single peak. (InFIG. 5, line 501 is the “G” peak; line 502 is the RBM”) 233 cm⁻¹; andline 503 is the fluorescent features at 912 nm). FIG. 5 also shows thatall Raman scattering features and fluorescence features are present innearly constant ratios indicating negligible separation.

FIG. 6 shows the result of applying an increasing electric field to thesample as a ramp from zero to 5 kV over 2 minutes and then expelling thesample using a pressure gradient. (In FIG. 6, line 601 is the “G” peak;line 602 is the RBM 233 cm⁻¹; and line 603 is the fluorescent featuresat 912 nm). The initial peak bifurcated into a bimodal distribution.Applying the electric field for 3 minutes further increased theseparation, as shown in FIG. 7. (In FIG. 7, line 701 is the “G” peak;line 702 is the RBM 233 cm⁻¹; and line 703 is the fluorescent featuresat 912 nm).

Application of the electric field for 2 hours with and without apressure gradient, separated the sample into a bimodal distribution withthe second concentrated fraction having a high quantum yield, as shownin FIGS. 8 and 9. FIG. 8 shows the separation at pH 5 with a pressuregradient. (In FIG. 8, line 801 is the “G” peak; line 802 is the RBM 233cm⁻¹; line 803 is the fluorescent features at 912 nm, and line 804 isthe fluorescent features at 870 nm). FIG. 9 shows the separation withouta pressure gradient. The separation was reproducible and did not showevidence of nanotube aggregation. (In FIG. 9, line 901 is the “G” peak;line 902 is the RBM 233 cm⁻¹; line 903 is the fluorescent features at912 nm, and line 904 is the fluorescent features at 870 nm).

Adjusting the pH of the nanotube suspension to pH 3 and subjecting thesample to an electric field, resulted in an even broader nanotubeseparation with three peaks. (See FIG. 10). FIG. 10 shows the separationof the nanotubes in terms of selected Raman and fluorescence peaks as afunction of elution time. (In FIG. 10, line 1001 is the “G” peak; line1002 is the RBM 233 cm⁻¹; line 1003 is the fluorescent features at 912nm, and line 1004 is the fluorescent features at 870 nm). The “A”, “B”,“C”, and “D” labels on the profiles of FIG. 10 correspond to theapproximate elution times of 0.75 hours, 1.25 hours, 1.6 hours and 1.8hours, respectively.

FIGS. 11A, 11B, 11C and 11D are Raman spectra that were taken at thesame approximate elution times, i.e., 0.75 hours, 1.25 hours, 1.6 hoursand 1.8 hours, respectively, and correspond to the “A”, “B”, “C”, and“D” labels on the time axis of FIG. 10. FIG. 11A, taken at about 0.75hours, shows that the early fractions are nanotube types that do notfluoresce, but show resonance-enhanced radial breathing mode peaks at215, 225 and 233 cm⁻¹. FIGS. 12A and 12B shows Raman spectra (using alaser wavelength at 785 nm) of the characteristic breathing mode peaksfor individually-dispersed and roped or raw single-wall carbonnanotubes, respectively. FIG. 12A shows the predominant 233 cm⁻¹ peakwith individually-dispersed nanotubes. FIG. 12B shows that roped oraggregated nanotubes, which do not fluoresce, consistently show adramatic loss of resonance enhancement of the peaks, 215, 225 and 233cm⁻¹, relative to peak at 266 cm⁻¹ which becomes visible. The lattereluting fractions, shown in FIGS. 11B, 11C and 11D, show increasedquantum yield of large band-gap semiconducting nanotubes as determinedby fluorescence intensity. FIG. 10 at point C and FIG. 11C indicate apeak intensity ratio of fluorescence to the Raman tangential mode “G”peak at about 1590 cm⁻¹, that is much higher than any previous recordedfor carbon nanotube samples.

EXAMPLE 4

This example demonstrates the separation of single-wall carbon nanotubesusing preferential ionization of metallic nanotubes in a mixture ofsingle-wall nanotube types using strong acids. Strong acidspreferentially ionize metallic nanotubes and render them susceptible toelectrophoretic type separations. Strong acids that can be used topreferentially ionize metallic single-wall carbon nanotubes include, butare not limited to, such acids as trifluoromethane sulfonic acid(CF₃SO₃H), concentrated sulfuric acid (H₂SO₄), hydrochloric acid (HCl),hydrofluoric acid (HF), nitric acid (HNO₃), fluorosulfuric acid (FSO₃H),chlorosulfonic acid (ClSO₃H), methane sulfonic acid (CH₃SO₃H), and oleum(H₂SO₄/SO₃). Either as-synthesized or purified single-wall carbonnanotube material can be treated with strong acid and the metallicnanotubes separated using a variety of different techniques includingselective solvation of the metallic nanotubes in strong acids,electrodeposition from strong acids, and electromigration in strong acidmedia to yield high concentrations of metallic nanotubes separated fromthe semiconducting types. The effect is shown in FIGS. 13A and 13Bplotting upshifts in the tangential mode Raman peaks for laseroven-produced SWNT material and HIPCO SWNT material (FIGS. 13A and 13B,respectively), using various acids.

EXAMPLE 5

This example demonstrates the change in fluorescence of semiconductingsingle-wall carbon nanotubes as a function of pH. A 1 wt % sodiumdodecyl sulfate (SDS) in D₂O was prepared. As-produced HIPCO®single-wall carbon nanotube material (Lot No. HPR45 produced by hightemperature, high pressure disproportionation of CO at Rice University),was mixed with a solution of 1 wt % SDS/D₂O such that the concentrationof nanotubes was about 10 mg/l. The solution was ultrasonicated tosuspend individual single-wall carbon nanotubes in surfactant micelles.The suspension was centrifuged to concentrate roped nanotubes, metallicimpurities and other higher carbon forms in the sediment.

The fluorescence spectra of the supernatant containingindividually-suspended nanotubes were subject to excitation having awavelength of 350 nm. The fluorescence spectrum of the suspension wascollected at pH 7. The pH was lowered step-wise from pH 7 to pH 3 withH₂SO₄. The fluorescence spectrum collected again at each pH. A compositeof all the spectra as a function of pH is given in FIG. 14A. (In FIG.14, line 1401 is pH 3; line 1402 is pH 4; line 1403 is pH 5; line 1404is pH 6; and line 1405 is pH 7). The fluorescence decreases with pH dueto the progressive protonation of the semiconducting nanotubes. Notmeant to be held by theory, the protonation of the semiconductingnanotubes progresses from higher pH to lower pH corresponding toprotonation of the smallest band gap semiconducting nanotubes to thelargest semiconducting nanotubes. At pH 3, all of the semiconductingnanotubes are protonated and no fluorescence signal is emitted. FIG. 14Bshows the decrease in fluorescence intensity (see lines 1406-1412) asthe pH is decreased from pH 4 (line 1406) to pH 3 (line 1412).

EXAMPLE 6

This example is a description of a SWNT sensor device for detectingdissolved carbon dioxide.

Individual carbon nanotubes refers to nanotubes processed in such a waythat they can be made to fluoresce and yield sharp peaks in the photonabsorption spectrum. They also have higher intensity Raman scatter uponlaser excitation. To obtain these, raw, unprocessed HIPCO single-wallcarbon nanotubes were produced by high pressure, high temperature ironcatalyzed CO disproportionation. These were combined with 1 wt % sodiumdodecyl sulfate (SDS) in heavy water (D₂O) to make a 200 mg/L nanotubesolution. The solution was sonicated for 10 minutes, ultracentrifuged at200,000 g for 2 hours and then the decant extracted. The nanotubesuspension was adjusted to pH=10, using 0.1 N NaOH, and/or exposed tolight and inert gas purge to remove quenching components from thenanotubes and obtain distinctive absorption features of the van Hovesingularities, provide strong resonance Raman peaks, and strongfluorescence features in the near infrared. This process providesindividually suspended nanotubes and minimizes quenching from eitheraggregation or adsorbed impurities.

The prepared nanotube suspension is placed in a closed glass containeroutfitted with a means for stirring or flowing the liquid. The gas to bedetected is introduced into the container. Temperature, pressure, andflow rates are monitored with standard laboratory apparatus. A diodelaser emitting red light in the range of 785 nm is transmitted by anoptical fiber and focused with a lens through a glass surface into thevessel containing the carbon nanotubes in suspension.

The resultant fluorescence and Raman scattered light is collected by anoptical lens and transmitted through optical fibers to a spectrometer.The scattered laser light is rejected by a filter means. The emittedlight is dispersed and detected by a charge-coupled device (CCD) arraydetector. An InGaAs array detector is also suitable, as this hassensitivity that extends further into the infrared. The electronicsignal from the detector is recorded by a computer, and this providesthe intensity of the emitted light as a function of wavelength orfrequency shift in the case of Raman scattering.

The spectrum shows a sequence of fluorescent features, or peaks,extending from 870 nm to about 1400 nm. Various diameter nanotubes emitvarious wavelengths, with the larger diameter nanotubes generallyemitting longer wavelengths. When molecules adsorb onto the walls of thenanotube, these spectra features are altered. The longer wavelengthfeatures are generally altered first, as the concentration of theadsorbate molecules increases.

As with many molecular species, when carbon dioxide is present in thewater, this alters the spectra being acquired. For lower concentrations,the longer wavelength emission derived from the larger nanotubesdiminishes first, and is monotonically decreasing with increasingconcentration. As the concentration increases, the longer wavelengthfluorescence is extinguished. The shorter wavelength fluorescence fromthe smaller nanotubes then diminishes with increasingly highconcentration. The signal intensities are compared to a referencespectrum for nanotube without the adsorbed gas. The concentration of thecarbon dioxide adsorbate, or other gases or liquids, may then bedetermined. The fluorescence also shows a “red shift” to longerwavelengths that is sensitive to adsorbates, generally those with oxygencapable of electron donor-acceptor (EDA) bonding.

The spectra also have resonance Raman features. The low frequency shiftsin the range of 200 to 370 cm⁻¹ correspond to the breathing modes, andthe strongly resonant modes such as the radial breathing mode (RBM)feature at 234 cm⁻¹, are diminished considerably as the carbon dioxideconcentration is increased. The “G-peak,” around 1592 cm⁻¹, is alsodiminished, as is the two-phonon “G′-peak” mode around 2600 cm⁻¹. Thedisorder “D-peak” around 1300 cm⁻¹ tends to increase.

These SWNT sensing devices rely on disaggregated single-walled carbonnanotubes, which require special preparation. The micelle suspensions,or nanotubes wrapped with PVP or other polymers may tend to come out ofsuspension under some circumstances. For some free-floating sensorapplications, it may be necessary to filter out the nanotubes in asubsequent step.

EXAMPLE 7

This example illustrates a nanotube-based sensor for pH usingsingle-wall carbon nanotubes. Because of its small size, the nanotubetip sensor could be used as a nanoscale, interfacial sensor. The sensorcomprises a fiber optic probe that irradiates 661-nm light and a surfaceof single-wall carbon nanotubes on the end of the probe. When the probetip is placed into a solution for pH measurement, protons from solutioninteract with the nanotube tip. The excitation light inducesfluorescence of the nanotube tip. Depending on the pH, some of thenanotubes will emit while others will not. The degree that each emitlight is a direct function of the solution pH. The light travels up theshaft through a separate fiber optic to a near-IR (infrared)spectrometer that analyzes the collected light.

Specialized sensors using type-selected nanotubes could be made in thesame way and detect selected pH limits, chemicals or conditions.

EXAMPLE 8

This example illustrates the use of single-wall carbon nanotubes tosense various molecules or molecular species, such as amines, ions,iodine, bromine, etc. A sensor could be constructed similar to thatdescribed in Example 6. Depending on the application and chemical moietybeing detected, a shift in the emission peak could be monitored. Forother applications, the decay of the emission and absorption peak couldbe monitored. The system is very robust in this way. Because of theprobe's small size, interfacial sensing could also be done with thesetypes of sensors. Concentration specific sensors could be made withtype-selected nanotubes.

EXAMPLE 9

This example illustrates the use of single-wall carbon nanotubes todetect oxygen (O₂). A sensor could be constructed similar to thatdescribed in Example 6. In the case of an O₂ sensor, a laser could bedirected through the barrel of the probe tip to clean off the nanotubetip before measurement. The probe could be placed in an enclosedmembrane vessel with acidic solution. The nanotubes would fluoresce aslong as no O₂ adsorbed on the surface, since the surface coverage of O₂systematically reduces the emission. Thus, the amount of oxygen insolution can be measured. The probe could be made extremely narrow (evennanometer) in scale for interfacial applications and other space-limitedapplications.

EXAMPLE 10

This example illustrates the use of single-wall carbon nanotubes todetect malignant cells, such as, but not limited to, cancer cells, in abody. Single-wall carbon nanotubes are individually dispersed in asolution using non-covalent isolating moieties, such as bio-compatiblepolymers. Examples of biocompatible polymers include, but are notlimited to, polymers and copolymers of polyethylene oxide andpolypropylene oxide. The nanotubes are wrapped or coated in thebiocompatible polymers and suspended in an aqueous media, such as water.Vigorous shear mixing and sonication is applied to the solution toindividually suspend at least some of the nanotubes. The individuallysuspended nanotubes are then separated from bundled nanotubes and othercarbonaceous and metallic matter by ultracentrifuging the mixture anddecanting the supernatant. Individually-suspended nanotubes in thesupernatant are reacted with a biological targeting moiety, such as amonoclonal antibody or other moiety that will attach to cancerous orother malignant cells.

The suspending media for the individual nanotubes that have been wrappedand “tagged” with a targeting moiety is either exchanged with abiocompatible fluid, such as a saline solution, or made compatible bythe addition of one or more biocompatibilizing agents, in order for thewrapped and tagged nanotubes to be introduced into a biological livingorganism. Once in the body, the monoclonal antibody or other malignantcell-binding moiety migrate through the body and attach to targetmalignant cells. After time has elapsed for sufficient migration andattachment, the body is irradiated with appropriate excitation,preferably in the near-IR due to ability to penetrate tissue, for theselected nanotube type and simultaneously scanned for near-IRfluorescence emission. The location of the fluorescence is mapped andattributed to the location of the nanotubes with target moietiesattached to the malignant cells. This sensor for malignant cells can beused on living organisms with minimal insult to the body.

EXAMPLE 11

This example illustrates the in vitro use of single-wall carbonnanotubes to detect and irradicate malignant cells, such as, but notlimited to, cancer cells, in a body. Single-wall carbon nanotubes areprepared such as in Example 10, such that the nanotubes are inindividually-suspended in a biocompatible solution and coated or wrappedwith a generally non-perturbing biocompatible polymer. Theindividually-suspended nanotubes are separated from other nanotubebundles and impurities by centrifugation. The individually-suspendednanotubes in the decanted supernatant are reacted with a biologicaltargeting moiety, such as a monoclonal antibody or other moiety thatwill attach to cancerous or other malignant cells.

The suspending media for the individual nanotubes that have been wrappedand “tagged” with a targeting moiety is either exchanged with abiocompatible fluid, such as a saline solution, or made compatible bythe addition of one or more biocompatibilizing agents, in order for thewrapped and tagged nanotubes to be introduced into a biological livingorganism. Once in the body, the monoclonal antibody or other malignantcell-binding moiety migrate through the body and attach to targetmalignant cells. After time has elapsed for sufficient migration andattachment, the body is irradiated with appropriate excitation,preferably in the near-IR due to ability to penetrate tissue, for theselected nanotube type and simultaneously scanned for near-IRfluorescence emission. The location of the fluorescence, attributed tothe nanotubes with target moieties attached to the malignant cells, canbe mapped in a 3-D fashion.

Besides mapping the malignant cells, the malignant cells may bedestroyed and irradicated by irradiating the nanotubes with anear-infrared laser that causes the nanotubes to absorb radiation andheat up. The localized heating of the nanotube, in contact with themalignant cell, causes the malignant cell to die by thermal necrosis.Raman spectroscopy can be used to monitor the local temperature of thenanotube.

In addition to “tagging” the nanotube with a targeting moiety, thenanotube can also be used as a vehicle for drug delivery. In this case,the nanotube tagged with a monoclonal antibody or other moiety designedto attach or congregate at malignant cell sites, also has an attacheddrug that is specific for the malignancy. When the nanotube is heated,the attached drug is designed to be liberated from the nanotube. Thus,the malignant cell is attacked and irradicated using both thermal andchemical processes.

All of the compositions and methods disclosed and claimed herein can bemade and executed without undue experimentation in light of the presentdisclosure. While the compositions and methods of this invention havebeen described in terms of preferred embodiments, it will be apparent tothose of skill in the art that variations may be applied to thecompositions and methods and in the steps or in the sequence of steps ofthe method described herein without departing from the concept, spiritand scope of the invention. More specifically, it will be apparent thatcertain agents which are both chemically and physiologically related maybe substituted for the agents described herein while the same or similarresults would be achieved. All such similar substitutes andmodifications apparent to those skilled in the art are deemed to bewithin the spirit, scope and concept of the invention as defined by theappended claims.

1-62. (canceled)
 63. A material comprising a plurality of single-wallcarbon nanotubes, wherein the plurality comprises at least about 15% ofthe same (n, m) type where n is not equal to m.
 64. The material ofclaim 63, wherein the plurality of single-wall carbon nanotubescomprises at least about 30% of the same (n, m) type where n is notequal to m.
 65. The material of claim 63, wherein the plurality ofsingle-wall carbon nanotubes comprises at least about 50% of the same(n, m) type where n is not equal to m.
 66. The material of claim 63,wherein the plurality of single-wall carbon nanotubes comprises at leastabout 70% of the same (n, m) type where n is not equal to m.
 67. Thematerial of claim 63, wherein the plurality of single-wall carbonnanotubes comprises at least about 90% of the same (n, m) type where nis not equal to m.
 68. The material of claim 63, wherein the single-wallcarbon nanotubes are fashioned into a two-dimensional array.
 69. Thematerial of claim 63, wherein the single-wall carbon nanotubes arefashioned into a three-dimensional object.
 70. The material of claim 63,wherein the single-wall carbon nanotubes are derivatized.
 71. Thematerial of claim 63, wherein the single-wall carbon nanotubes aresemiconducting.
 72. The material of claim 71, wherein the single-wallcarbon nanotubes are a part of a sensor.
 73. The material of claim 63,wherein said material is embedded in a matrix material.
 74. The materialof claim 71, wherein said matrix material is selected from the groupconsisting of polymers, ceramics, metals, and combinations thereof. 75.The material of claim 63, wherein said material is dispersed in asuspending medium.
 76. The material of claim 63 wherein the nanotubes of(n, m) type are selected from the group of (n, m) types consisting of(5,4), (6,4), (9,1), (8,3), (6,5), (7,5), (10,2), (9,4), (8,4), (7,6),(9,2), (12,1), (8,6), (11,3), (9,5), (10,3), (10,5), (11,1), (8,7),(13,2), (9,7), (12,4), (11,4), (12,2), (10,6), (11,6), (9,8), (15,1),(10,8), (13,5), (12,5), (13,3), and (10,9).